[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Thomas Petazzoni]

In Python 3.x, check_output() returns a "bytes" array, and not a
string. Its result needs to be decoded to be turned into a
string. Without this fix, "get-developers -c" bails out with:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 105, in <module>
    __main__()
  File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 53, in __main__
    files = getdeveloperlib.check_developers(devs)
  File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/utils/getdeveloperlib.py", line 280, in check_developers
    files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).strip().split("\n")
TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 utils/getdeveloperlib.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/utils/getdeveloperlib.py b/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
index 438d26d68d..f351f05a1f 100644
--- a/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
+++ b/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ def check_developers(developers, basepath=None):
     if basepath is None:
         basepath = os.getcwd()
     cmd = ["git", "--git-dir", os.path.join(basepath, ".git"), "ls-files"]
-    files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).strip().split("\n")
+    files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).decode(sys.stdout.encoding).strip().split("\n")
     unhandled_files = []
     for f in files:
         handled = False
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

[Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: call Developer.hasfile() with relative path

[Thomas Petazzoni]

In commit
40bb37bd70d46822e803aaa5169dee8ff8b51093 ("utils/getdeveloperlib.py:
use relative paths for files"), the Developer class was changed to use
relative paths, including for its .hasfile() method.

However the check_developers() function of getdeveloperlib.py was not
updated accordingly, and continued to pass absolute paths. This caused
"get-developers -c" to return the entire list of files in Buildroot as
being unmaintained, as none of them were matching the file listed in
the DEVELOPERS file.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
---
 utils/getdeveloperlib.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/utils/getdeveloperlib.py b/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
index f351f05a1f..f2b36862e3 100644
--- a/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
+++ b/utils/getdeveloperlib.py
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ def check_developers(developers, basepath=None):
     for f in files:
         handled = False
         for d in developers:
-            if d.hasfile(os.path.join(basepath, f)):
+            if d.hasfile(f):
                 handled = True
                 break
         if not handled:
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: call Developer.hasfile() with relative path

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:

 > In commit
 > 40bb37bd70d46822e803aaa5169dee8ff8b51093 ("utils/getdeveloperlib.py:
 > use relative paths for files"), the Developer class was changed to use
 > relative paths, including for its .hasfile() method.

 > However the check_developers() function of getdeveloperlib.py was not
 > updated accordingly, and continued to pass absolute paths. This caused
 > "get-developers -c" to return the entire list of files in Buildroot as
 > being unmaintained, as none of them were matching the file listed in
 > the DEVELOPERS file.

 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Committed to 2021.02.x and 2021.08.x, thanks.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:

 > In Python 3.x, check_output() returns a "bytes" array, and not a
 > string. Its result needs to be decoded to be turned into a
 > string. Without this fix, "get-developers -c" bails out with:

 > Traceback (most recent call last):
 >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 105, in <module>
 >     __main__()
 >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 53, in __main__
 >     files = getdeveloperlib.check_developers(devs)
 >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/utils/getdeveloperlib.py", line 280, in check_developers
 >     files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).strip().split("\n")
 > TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'

 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>

Alternatively we could use universal_newlines=True, but Ok - Committed
to 2021.02.x and 2021.08.x, thanks.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Thomas Petazzoni]

On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 22:15:42 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> wrote:

> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:  
> 
>  > In Python 3.x, check_output() returns a "bytes" array, and not a
>  > string. Its result needs to be decoded to be turned into a
>  > string. Without this fix, "get-developers -c" bails out with:  
> 
>  > Traceback (most recent call last):
>  >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 105, in <module>
>  >     __main__()
>  >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 53, in __main__
>  >     files = getdeveloperlib.check_developers(devs)
>  >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/utils/getdeveloperlib.py", line 280, in check_developers
>  >     files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).strip().split("\n")
>  > TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'  
> 
>  > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>  
> 
> Alternatively we could use universal_newlines=True, but Ok - Committed
> to 2021.02.x and 2021.08.x, thanks.

But was this committed to master already? It seems not. Isn't it
dangerous to start committing stuff to stable branches that are not in
master? I thought you were only cherry-picking stuff from master.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:

 > On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 22:15:42 +0100
 > Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> wrote:

 >> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> writes:  
 >> 
 >> > In Python 3.x, check_output() returns a "bytes" array, and not a
 >> > string. Its result needs to be decoded to be turned into a
 >> > string. Without this fix, "get-developers -c" bails out with:  
 >> 
 >> > Traceback (most recent call last):
 >> >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 105, in <module>
 >> >     __main__()
 >> >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/./utils/get-developers", line 53, in __main__
 >> >     files = getdeveloperlib.check_developers(devs)
 >> >   File "/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/utils/getdeveloperlib.py", line 280, in check_developers
 >> >     files = subprocess.check_output(cmd).strip().split("\n")
 >> > TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'  
 >> 
 >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>  
 >> 
 >> Alternatively we could use universal_newlines=True, but Ok - Committed
 >> to 2021.02.x and 2021.08.x, thanks.

 > But was this committed to master already? It seems not. Isn't it
 > dangerous to start committing stuff to stable branches that are not in
 > master? I thought you were only cherry-picking stuff from master.

I am, you applied it to master yesterday?

https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=53da6a7c05f75af925d235f22db2142b5067806e

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] utils/getdeveloperlib.py: fix check_output() return value decoding

[Thomas Petazzoni]

On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 23:10:29 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> wrote:

>  > But was this committed to master already? It seems not. Isn't it
>  > dangerous to start committing stuff to stable branches that are not in
>  > master? I thought you were only cherry-picking stuff from master.  
> 
> I am, you applied it to master yesterday?
> 
> https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/?id=53da6a7c05f75af925d235f22db2142b5067806e

Meh, applying them was not intentional :-/

Sorry for the mess.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot