* [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases
@ 2022-05-17 14:19 Linus Kaschulla via buildroot
2022-05-17 20:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Kaschulla via buildroot @ 2022-05-17 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot; +Cc: Linus Kaschulla, Yann E . MORIN
For the new patch, adding block size options (commit 555f8dfd),
Yann E. MORIN requested updated testcases that specifically ensure
the extreme blocksizes (4K and 1024K) don't cause issues.
This patch splits the current test case in 2, testing with both
block sizes and ensuring the block size was applied in the same
fashion as for the specified compression.
Signed-off-by: Linus Kaschulla <linus@cosmos-ink.net>
---
support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
index a914f5aac7..07239fcce2 100644
--- a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
+++ b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
@@ -3,13 +3,15 @@ import os
import infra.basetest
-class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
+class TestSquashfsMinBlocksize(infra.basetest.BRTest):
config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
"""
BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_4K=y
BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
"""
+ expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 4
def test_run(self):
unsquashfs_cmd = ["host/bin/unsquashfs", "-s", "images/rootfs.squashfs"]
@@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
self.assertEqual(out[0],
"Found a valid SQUASHFS 4:0 superblock on images/rootfs.squashfs.")
self.assertEqual(out[3], "Compression lzo")
+ self.assertEqual(out[4], "Block size {}".format(self.expected_blocksize_in_bytes))
img = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "rootfs.squashfs")
infra.img_round_power2(img)
@@ -31,3 +34,15 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
cmd = "mount | grep '/dev/root on / type squashfs'"
self.assertRunOk(cmd)
+
+# Reusing TestSquashfsMinBlocksize's test_run(), but change
+# blocksize in config the maxium to ensure all extemes work.
+class TestSquashfsMaxBlocksize(TestSquashfsMinBlocksize):
+ config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
+ """
+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_1024K=y
+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
+ # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
+ """
+ expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 1024
--
2.35.1
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases
2022-05-17 14:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases Linus Kaschulla via buildroot
@ 2022-05-17 20:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-05-17 20:56 ` Linus via buildroot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2022-05-17 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Kaschulla; +Cc: buildroot
Linus, All,
On 2022-05-17 14:19 +0000, Linus Kaschulla via buildroot spake thusly:
> For the new patch, adding block size options (commit 555f8dfd),
> Yann E. MORIN requested updated testcases that specifically ensure
> the extreme blocksizes (4K and 1024K) don't cause issues.
>
> This patch splits the current test case in 2, testing with both
> block sizes and ensuring the block size was applied in the same
> fashion as for the specified compression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Kaschulla <linus@cosmos-ink.net>
> ---
> support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> index a914f5aac7..07239fcce2 100644
> --- a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> +++ b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> @@ -3,13 +3,15 @@ import os
> import infra.basetest
>
>
> -class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> +class TestSquashfsMinBlocksize(infra.basetest.BRTest):
In fact I think we need to keep the existing test that uses the default
value too.
> config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
> """
> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_4K=y
> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> """
> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 4
>
> def test_run(self):
> unsquashfs_cmd = ["host/bin/unsquashfs", "-s", "images/rootfs.squashfs"]
> @@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> self.assertEqual(out[0],
> "Found a valid SQUASHFS 4:0 superblock on images/rootfs.squashfs.")
> self.assertEqual(out[3], "Compression lzo")
> + self.assertEqual(out[4], "Block size {}".format(self.expected_blocksize_in_bytes))
>
> img = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "rootfs.squashfs")
> infra.img_round_power2(img)
> @@ -31,3 +34,15 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>
> cmd = "mount | grep '/dev/root on / type squashfs'"
> self.assertRunOk(cmd)
> +
$ make check-flake8
WARNING: support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py:40:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
Yes, like check-package, this is 100% totally undocumented. :-]
So, I've restored the original test that checks the default, and two new
tersts that check the min and max, and I fixed the flake8 issue.
Applied to master, thanks.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> +# Reusing TestSquashfsMinBlocksize's test_run(), but change
> +# blocksize in config the maxium to ensure all extemes work.
> +class TestSquashfsMaxBlocksize(TestSquashfsMinBlocksize):
> + config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
> + """
> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_1024K=y
> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
> + # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> + """
> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 1024
> --
> 2.35.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot@buildroot.org
> https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases
2022-05-17 20:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
@ 2022-05-17 20:56 ` Linus via buildroot
2022-05-17 21:04 ` Yann E. MORIN
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus via buildroot @ 2022-05-17 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann E. MORIN; +Cc: buildroot
Thanks for adding it!
You've been really helpful. I really appreciate the time you set aside
for me.
Huge Thanks,
Linus Kaschulla
P.S.: I might probably add the pv utility (pipeview) sometime later as I
consider the tool essential and noticed it missing. But might be a few
months until I get to that. Should be a pretty easy addtion tough.
Am 17.05.22 um 22:40 schrieb Yann E. MORIN:
> Linus, All,
>
> On 2022-05-17 14:19 +0000, Linus Kaschulla via buildroot spake thusly:
>> For the new patch, adding block size options (commit 555f8dfd),
>> Yann E. MORIN requested updated testcases that specifically ensure
>> the extreme blocksizes (4K and 1024K) don't cause issues.
>>
>> This patch splits the current test case in 2, testing with both
>> block sizes and ensuring the block size was applied in the same
>> fashion as for the specified compression.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Kaschulla <linus@cosmos-ink.net>
>> ---
>> support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>> index a914f5aac7..07239fcce2 100644
>> --- a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>> +++ b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>> @@ -3,13 +3,15 @@ import os
>> import infra.basetest
>>
>>
>> -class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>> +class TestSquashfsMinBlocksize(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> In fact I think we need to keep the existing test that uses the default
> value too.
>
>> config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
>> """
>> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_4K=y
>> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
>> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
>> """
>> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 4
>>
>> def test_run(self):
>> unsquashfs_cmd = ["host/bin/unsquashfs", "-s", "images/rootfs.squashfs"]
>> @@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>> self.assertEqual(out[0],
>> "Found a valid SQUASHFS 4:0 superblock on images/rootfs.squashfs.")
>> self.assertEqual(out[3], "Compression lzo")
>> + self.assertEqual(out[4], "Block size {}".format(self.expected_blocksize_in_bytes))
>>
>> img = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "rootfs.squashfs")
>> infra.img_round_power2(img)
>> @@ -31,3 +34,15 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>>
>> cmd = "mount | grep '/dev/root on / type squashfs'"
>> self.assertRunOk(cmd)
>> +
> $ make check-flake8
> WARNING: support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py:40:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
>
> Yes, like check-package, this is 100% totally undocumented. :-]
>
> So, I've restored the original test that checks the default, and two new
> tersts that check the min and max, and I fixed the flake8 issue.
>
> Applied to master, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
>> +# Reusing TestSquashfsMinBlocksize's test_run(), but change
>> +# blocksize in config the maxium to ensure all extemes work.
>> +class TestSquashfsMaxBlocksize(TestSquashfsMinBlocksize):
>> + config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
>> + """
>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_1024K=y
>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
>> + # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
>> + """
>> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 1024
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot@buildroot.org
>> https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases
2022-05-17 20:56 ` Linus via buildroot
@ 2022-05-17 21:04 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-05-17 21:08 ` Linus via buildroot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yann E. MORIN @ 2022-05-17 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus; +Cc: buildroot
Linus, All,
On 2022-05-17 22:56 +0200, Linus spake thusly:
> You've been really helpful. I really appreciate the time you set aside for
> me.
It benefits us all, so thanks!
> Huge Thanks,
> Linus Kaschulla
>
> P.S.: I might probably add the pv utility (pipeview) sometime later as I
> consider the tool essential and noticed it missing. But might be a few
> months until I get to that. Should be a pretty easy addtion tough.
Err.. we do have it, no? See: package/pv/
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> Am 17.05.22 um 22:40 schrieb Yann E. MORIN:
> >Linus, All,
> >
> >On 2022-05-17 14:19 +0000, Linus Kaschulla via buildroot spake thusly:
> >>For the new patch, adding block size options (commit 555f8dfd),
> >>Yann E. MORIN requested updated testcases that specifically ensure
> >>the extreme blocksizes (4K and 1024K) don't cause issues.
> >>
> >>This patch splits the current test case in 2, testing with both
> >>block sizes and ensuring the block size was applied in the same
> >>fashion as for the specified compression.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Linus Kaschulla <linus@cosmos-ink.net>
> >>---
> >> support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> >>index a914f5aac7..07239fcce2 100644
> >>--- a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> >>+++ b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
> >>@@ -3,13 +3,15 @@ import os
> >> import infra.basetest
> >>-class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> >>+class TestSquashfsMinBlocksize(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> >In fact I think we need to keep the existing test that uses the default
> >value too.
> >
> >> config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
> >> """
> >> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
> >>+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_4K=y
> >> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
> >> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> >> """
> >>+ expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 4
> >> def test_run(self):
> >> unsquashfs_cmd = ["host/bin/unsquashfs", "-s", "images/rootfs.squashfs"]
> >>@@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> >> self.assertEqual(out[0],
> >> "Found a valid SQUASHFS 4:0 superblock on images/rootfs.squashfs.")
> >> self.assertEqual(out[3], "Compression lzo")
> >>+ self.assertEqual(out[4], "Block size {}".format(self.expected_blocksize_in_bytes))
> >> img = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "rootfs.squashfs")
> >> infra.img_round_power2(img)
> >>@@ -31,3 +34,15 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> >> cmd = "mount | grep '/dev/root on / type squashfs'"
> >> self.assertRunOk(cmd)
> >>+
> > $ make check-flake8
> > WARNING: support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py:40:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
> >
> >Yes, like check-package, this is 100% totally undocumented. :-]
> >
> >So, I've restored the original test that checks the default, and two new
> >tersts that check the min and max, and I fixed the flake8 issue.
> >
> >Applied to master, thanks.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Yann E. MORIN.
> >
> >>+# Reusing TestSquashfsMinBlocksize's test_run(), but change
> >>+# blocksize in config the maxium to ensure all extemes work.
> >>+class TestSquashfsMaxBlocksize(TestSquashfsMinBlocksize):
> >>+ config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
> >>+ """
> >>+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
> >>+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_1024K=y
> >>+ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
> >>+ # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> >>+ """
> >>+ expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 1024
> >>--
> >>2.35.1
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>buildroot mailing list
> >>buildroot@buildroot.org
> >>https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases
2022-05-17 21:04 ` Yann E. MORIN
@ 2022-05-17 21:08 ` Linus via buildroot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus via buildroot @ 2022-05-17 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann E. MORIN; +Cc: buildroot
> Err.. we do have it, no? See: package/pv/
Oh, didn't notice somehow! Thanks for the heads up!
Greetings,
Linus Kaschulla
Am 17.05.22 um 23:04 schrieb Yann E. MORIN:
> Linus, All,
>
> On 2022-05-17 22:56 +0200, Linus spake thusly:
>> You've been really helpful. I really appreciate the time you set aside for
>> me.
> It benefits us all, so thanks!
>
>> Huge Thanks,
>> Linus Kaschulla
>>
>> P.S.: I might probably add the pv utility (pipeview) sometime later as I
>> consider the tool essential and noticed it missing. But might be a few
>> months until I get to that. Should be a pretty easy addtion tough.
> Err.. we do have it, no? See: package/pv/
>
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
>> Am 17.05.22 um 22:40 schrieb Yann E. MORIN:
>>> Linus, All,
>>>
>>> On 2022-05-17 14:19 +0000, Linus Kaschulla via buildroot spake thusly:
>>>> For the new patch, adding block size options (commit 555f8dfd),
>>>> Yann E. MORIN requested updated testcases that specifically ensure
>>>> the extreme blocksizes (4K and 1024K) don't cause issues.
>>>>
>>>> This patch splits the current test case in 2, testing with both
>>>> block sizes and ensuring the block size was applied in the same
>>>> fashion as for the specified compression.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Linus Kaschulla <linus@cosmos-ink.net>
>>>> ---
>>>> support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>>>> index a914f5aac7..07239fcce2 100644
>>>> --- a/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>>>> +++ b/support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py
>>>> @@ -3,13 +3,15 @@ import os
>>>> import infra.basetest
>>>> -class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>>>> +class TestSquashfsMinBlocksize(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>>> In fact I think we need to keep the existing test that uses the default
>>> value too.
>>>
>>>> config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
>>>> """
>>>> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
>>>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_4K=y
>>>> BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
>>>> # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
>>>> """
>>>> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 4
>>>> def test_run(self):
>>>> unsquashfs_cmd = ["host/bin/unsquashfs", "-s", "images/rootfs.squashfs"]
>>>> @@ -18,6 +20,7 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>>>> self.assertEqual(out[0],
>>>> "Found a valid SQUASHFS 4:0 superblock on images/rootfs.squashfs.")
>>>> self.assertEqual(out[3], "Compression lzo")
>>>> + self.assertEqual(out[4], "Block size {}".format(self.expected_blocksize_in_bytes))
>>>> img = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "rootfs.squashfs")
>>>> infra.img_round_power2(img)
>>>> @@ -31,3 +34,15 @@ class TestSquashfs(infra.basetest.BRTest):
>>>> cmd = "mount | grep '/dev/root on / type squashfs'"
>>>> self.assertRunOk(cmd)
>>>> +
>>> $ make check-flake8
>>> WARNING: support/testing/tests/fs/test_squashfs.py:40:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
>>>
>>> Yes, like check-package, this is 100% totally undocumented. :-]
>>>
>>> So, I've restored the original test that checks the default, and two new
>>> tersts that check the min and max, and I fixed the flake8 issue.
>>>
>>> Applied to master, thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yann E. MORIN.
>>>
>>>> +# Reusing TestSquashfsMinBlocksize's test_run(), but change
>>>> +# blocksize in config the maxium to ensure all extemes work.
>>>> +class TestSquashfsMaxBlocksize(TestSquashfsMinBlocksize):
>>>> + config = infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG + \
>>>> + """
>>>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
>>>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS_BS_1024K=y
>>>> + BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS4_LZO=y
>>>> + # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
>>>> + """
>>>> + expected_blocksize_in_bytes = 1024 * 1024
>>>> --
>>>> 2.35.1
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> buildroot mailing list
>>>> buildroot@buildroot.org
>>>> https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-17 21:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-17 14:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] fs/squashfs: needs more test cases Linus Kaschulla via buildroot
2022-05-17 20:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-05-17 20:56 ` Linus via buildroot
2022-05-17 21:04 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-05-17 21:08 ` Linus via buildroot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox