* [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed @ 2022-08-06 20:43 Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-06 22:28 ` Heiko Thiery 2022-08-08 8:14 ` Thomas Huth 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-06 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Davide Viti, Filip Skoneczny, Gustavo Pimentel, Heiko Thiery, Jagan Teki, Louis Aussedat, Marek Belisko, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Romain Naour, Suniel Mahesh, Thomas Huth, Yann E. MORIN Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Hello, This is another reminder about the below defconfigs, which are failing to build in Buildroot. If they are not fixed soon, they will be removed before the 2022.08 release, expected to be released at the end of August. Please let us know if you are no longer interested in maintaining some of those defconfigs. Thanks for your contribution! Thomas rockpro64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812054016 rock_pi_ni10_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812054009 rock_pi_4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812054006 roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053999 raspberrypi3_qt5we_defconfig -> build failure in qt5webengine https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053961 qemu_xtensa_lx60_nommu_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053940 qemu_m68k_mcf5208_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053827 pine64_sopine_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053812 pine64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053810 orangepi_win_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053792 orangepi_rk3399_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053790 orangepi_prime_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053786 orangepi_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053784 orangepi_pc2_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053776 orangepi_one_plus_defconfig -> Device Tree syntax error https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053771 kontron_bl_imx8mm_defconfig -> -lgnutls -luuid missing when building U-Boot. Strange thing is that host-gnutls is definitely built before U-Boot, but it doesn't find it. for libuuid, BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_UTIL_LINUX=y is missing https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053608 friendlyarm_nanopi_r1_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053547 friendlyarm_nanopi_neo_plus2_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053545 friendlyarm_nanopi_neo_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053540 friendlyarm_nanopi_neo4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053537 friendlyarm_nanopi_neo2_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053533 friendlyarm_nanopi_m4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053529 friendlyarm_nanopi_m1_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053526 friendlyarm_nanopi_m1_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053522 friendlyarm_nanopi_a64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053520 friendlyarm_nanopc_t4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053518 bananapi_m64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053420 bananapi_m2_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053415 bananapi_m1_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053412 bananapi_m1_defconfig -> Device Tree syntax error https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053409 arm_juno_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053341 amarula_a64_relic_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053333 -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-06 20:43 [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-06 22:28 ` Heiko Thiery 2022-08-08 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-08 8:14 ` Thomas Huth 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Heiko Thiery @ 2022-08-06 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Thomas Huth, Gustavo Pimentel, buildroot@buildroot.org, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, Suniel Mahesh, Romain Naour, Yann E. MORIN Hi Thomas, [snip] > kontron_bl_imx8mm_defconfig -> -lgnutls -luuid missing when building > U-Boot. Strange thing is that host-gnutls is definitely built before > U-Boot, but it doesn't find it. for libuuid, > BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_UTIL_LINUX=y is missing > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053608 This is the first time I have been informed about this build failure. I am surprised that I did not get any mail about this. I must confess that I could have guessed that this would be the same error as with the kontron_pitx_imx8m_defconfig. My fault. Nonetheless I will fix that and send a patch. -- Heiko > friendlyarm_nanopi_r1_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053547 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_neo_plus2_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053545 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_neo_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053540 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_neo4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053537 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_neo2_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053533 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_m4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053529 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_m1_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053526 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_m1_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053522 > > friendlyarm_nanopi_a64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053520 > > friendlyarm_nanopc_t4_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053518 > > bananapi_m64_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053420 > > bananapi_m2_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053415 > > bananapi_m1_plus_defconfig -> U-Boot needs Python 2.x > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053412 > > bananapi_m1_defconfig -> Device Tree syntax error > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053409 > > arm_juno_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053341 > > amarula_a64_relic_defconfig -> arm-trusted-firmware fails to build > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053333 > > > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training > https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-06 22:28 ` Heiko Thiery @ 2022-08-08 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-12 6:32 ` Suniel Mahesh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-08 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Thiery Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Thomas Huth, Gustavo Pimentel, buildroot@buildroot.org, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, Suniel Mahesh, Romain Naour, Yann E. MORIN Hello Heiko, On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 00:28:46 +0200 Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the first time I have been informed about this build failure. > I am surprised that I did not get any mail about this. Sorry, your issue is potentially new. It's mainly the other issues that I have already reported in the past, and which did not get any feedback, on defconfigs that are not properly maintained (all those friendlyarm/bananapi/orangepi boards). > Nonetheless I will fix that and send a patch. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-08 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-12 6:32 ` Suniel Mahesh 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Suniel Mahesh @ 2022-08-12 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Thomas Huth, Gustavo Pimentel, Yann E. MORIN, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, buildroot@buildroot.org, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 902 bytes --] On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 1:58 PM Thomas Petazzoni < thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > Hello Heiko, > > On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 00:28:46 +0200 > Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is the first time I have been informed about this build failure. > > I am surprised that I did not get any mail about this. > > Sorry, your issue is potentially new. It's mainly the other issues that > I have already reported in the past, and which did not get any > feedback, on defconfigs that are not properly maintained (all those > friendlyarm/bananapi/orangepi boards). > Hi Thomas, I will try to fix the defconfigs related to friendlyarm/bananapi/orangepi boards ASAP. Thanks Suniel > > > Nonetheless I will fix that and send a patch. > > Thanks a lot! > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training > https://bootlin.com > [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1648 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --] _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-06 20:43 [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-06 22:28 ` Heiko Thiery @ 2022-08-08 8:14 ` Thomas Huth 2022-08-08 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-08-08 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Gustavo Pimentel, buildroot@buildroot.org, Yann E. MORIN, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, Suniel Mahesh, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour Am Sat, 6 Aug 2022 22:43:38 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>: > Hello, > > This is another reminder about the below defconfigs, which are failing > to build in Buildroot. If they are not fixed soon, they will be removed > before the 2022.08 release, expected to be released at the end of > August. > > Please let us know if you are no longer interested in maintaining some > of those defconfigs. [...] > qemu_xtensa_lx60_nommu_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053940 > > qemu_m68k_mcf5208_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053827 I'm interested in keeping the qemu defconfigs alive, please don't remove them yet. I'll try to figure out what's going wrong here. Thomas _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-08 8:14 ` Thomas Huth @ 2022-08-08 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-08 19:59 ` Thomas Huth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-08 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Huth Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Gustavo Pimentel, buildroot@buildroot.org, Yann E. MORIN, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, Suniel Mahesh, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour Hello Thomas, On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:14:52 +0200 Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org> wrote: > > qemu_xtensa_lx60_nommu_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053940 > > > > qemu_m68k_mcf5208_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053827 > > I'm interested in keeping the qemu defconfigs alive, please don't remove > them yet. I'll try to figure out what's going wrong here. So these are "special" issues. The elf2flt segfault is caused by the changes in elf2flt to support RISC-V 64-bit noMMU, in commit 32f93b0ef2c602dfa1f5b243ba865d5b16e2fa33. However, even with this removed, we have issues with elf2flt. See https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/20220725164425.7316b2e3@windsurf/ for more details, and also https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/ce677d88-8f8e-2d81-4e7b-69a35a99c6b9@smile.fr/. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-08 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-08 19:59 ` Thomas Huth 2022-08-12 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-08-08 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Petazzoni, buildroot Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Gustavo Pimentel, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, Suniel Mahesh, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour, "Yann E. MORIN\" <yann.morin.1998 Am Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:26:53 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>: > Hello Thomas, > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:14:52 +0200 > Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org> wrote: > > > > qemu_xtensa_lx60_nommu_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > > > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053940 > > > > > > qemu_m68k_mcf5208_defconfig -> elf2flt segfaults > > > https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/2812053827 > > > > I'm interested in keeping the qemu defconfigs alive, please don't remove > > them yet. I'll try to figure out what's going wrong here. > > So these are "special" issues. The elf2flt segfault is caused by the > changes in elf2flt to support RISC-V 64-bit noMMU, in commit > 32f93b0ef2c602dfa1f5b243ba865d5b16e2fa33. > > However, even with this removed, we have issues with elf2flt. See > https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/20220725164425.7316b2e3@windsurf/ for > more details, and also > https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/ce677d88-8f8e-2d81-4e7b-69a35a99c6b9@smile.fr/. Thanks for the pointers! I had a look at the source for a while, and from what I can see, I came to the same conclusion that the modifications for ARM should really not have been done for m68k / binutils 2.32. I can get the mcf5208 board back working by applying a patch like this on top of the current state in buildroot (fixes both, the segfault and the section overlapping): diff -u output/build/host-elf2flt-2021.08/elf2flt.c output/build/host-elf2flt-2021.08/elf2flt.c.new --- output/build/host-elf2flt-2021.08/elf2flt.c 2022-08-08 20:45:00.671502651 +0200 +++ output/build/host-elf2flt-2021.08/elf2flt.c.new 2022-08-08 20:45:51.105171045 +0200 @@ -346,6 +346,17 @@ } #endif +static int is_text_sec(asection *s) +{ +#if defined(TARGET_m68k) || defined(TARGET_xtensa) + return (s->flags & SEC_CODE); +#else + return ((s->flags & SEC_CODE) || + ((s->flags & (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) == + (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC))); +#endif +} + static uint32_t * output_relocs ( bfd *abs_bfd, @@ -435,10 +446,7 @@ * Only relocate things in the writable data sections if we are PIC/GOT. * Otherwise do text (and read only data) as well. */ - if ((!pic_with_got || ALWAYS_RELOC_TEXT) && - ((a->flags & SEC_CODE) || - ((a->flags & (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) == - (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)))) + if ((!pic_with_got || ALWAYS_RELOC_TEXT) && is_text_sec(a)) sectionp = text + (a->vma - text_vma); else if (a->flags & SEC_DATA) sectionp = data + (a->vma - data_vma); @@ -1901,10 +1909,7 @@ bfd_size_type sec_size; bfd_vma sec_vma; - if ((s->flags & SEC_CODE) || - (((s->flags & (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) == - (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) && - !data_len)) { + if (is_text_sec(s) && !data_len) { vma = &text_vma; len = &text_len; } else if (s->flags & SEC_DATA) { @@ -1941,9 +1946,7 @@ * Includes code sections, but also includes read-only relocation * data sections.*/ for (s = abs_bfd->sections; s != NULL; s = s->next) - if ((s->flags & SEC_CODE) || - ((s->flags & (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) == - (SEC_DATA | SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC))) + if (is_text_sec(s)) if (!bfd_get_section_contents(abs_bfd, s, text + (s->vma - text_vma), 0, elf2flt_bfd_section_size(s))) @@ -1971,9 +1974,7 @@ * Includes data sections, but not those read-only relocation * data sections already included in the text output section.*/ for (s = abs_bfd->sections; s != NULL; s = s->next) - if ((s->flags & SEC_DATA) && - ((s->flags & (SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC)) != - (SEC_READONLY | SEC_RELOC))) + if ((s->flags & SEC_DATA) && !is_text_sec(s)) if (!bfd_get_section_contents(abs_bfd, s, data + (s->vma - data_vma), 0, elf2flt_bfd_section_size(s))) Does that look passable for buildroot? If so, I can send it as a proper patch for buildroot (i.e. a patch that adds a patch to the packages/elf2flt/ directory) and also try to get it upstream later. If not ... I'm also running out of ideas here ... then maybe it's really time to retire the old boards that depend on binutils 2.32 nowadays... Thomas _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-08 19:59 ` Thomas Huth @ 2022-08-12 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-15 9:50 ` Thomas Huth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-12 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Huth Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Gustavo Pimentel, "Yann E. MORIN\" <yann.morin.1998, Suniel Mahesh, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, buildroot, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour Hello Thomas, On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 21:59:00 +0200 Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org> wrote: > Thanks for the pointers! I had a look at the source for a while, and from > what I can see, I came to the same conclusion that the modifications for > ARM should really not have been done for m68k / binutils 2.32. > > I can get the mcf5208 board back working by applying a patch like this on > top of the current state in buildroot (fixes both, the segfault and the > section overlapping): FYI, a patch was posted and merged: https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=95402089c314fbc03b934f5fcf9c29db043d758c https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=9dd179d43ffe9be98035f921a0db2bf051b632fb Don't hesitate to give a test on your side! Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed 2022-08-12 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot @ 2022-08-15 9:50 ` Thomas Huth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-08-15 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Louis Aussedat, Filip Skoneczny, Marek Belisko, Gustavo Pimentel, "Yann E. MORIN\" <yann.morin.1998, Suniel Mahesh, Davide Viti, Mike Harmony, Peter Seiderer, Jagan Teki, buildroot, Heiko Thiery, Romain Naour Am Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:52:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>: > Hello Thomas, > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 21:59:00 +0200 > Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointers! I had a look at the source for a while, and from > > what I can see, I came to the same conclusion that the modifications for > > ARM should really not have been done for m68k / binutils 2.32. > > > > I can get the mcf5208 board back working by applying a patch like this on > > top of the current state in buildroot (fixes both, the segfault and the > > section overlapping): > > FYI, a patch was posted and merged: > > https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=95402089c314fbc03b934f5fcf9c29db043d758c > https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=9dd179d43ffe9be98035f921a0db2bf051b632fb > > Don't hesitate to give a test on your side! Thanks, I've checked it and it works fine for me, too! Thomas H _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-15 9:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-08-06 20:43 [Buildroot] Buildroot defconfigs about to be removed Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-06 22:28 ` Heiko Thiery 2022-08-08 8:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-12 6:32 ` Suniel Mahesh 2022-08-08 8:14 ` Thomas Huth 2022-08-08 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-08 19:59 ` Thomas Huth 2022-08-12 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot 2022-08-15 9:50 ` Thomas Huth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox