Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/zynq_zc702_defconfig: new defconfig

[Luca Ceresoli via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:39:36 +0100
Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com> wrote:

> >>>>> "Frager," == Frager, Neal <neal.frager@amd.com> writes:  
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  > The remaining question is just a matter of how many zynq, zynqmp and
>  > versal defconfigs is the right amount for buildroot?  I would like to
>  > be able to support the following 11 boards, if it would be ok for the
>  > buildroot community.  5 of these 11 are already included in
>  > buildroot.  
> 
>  > zynq_zc702
>  > zynq_zc706
>  > zynqmp_zcu102
>  > zynqmp_zcu104
>  > zynqmp_zcu106
>  > zynqmp_kria_kd240
>  > zynqmp_kria_kr260
>  > zynqmp_kria_kv260
>  > versal_vck190
>  > versal_vek280 (coming next year)
>  > versal_vmk180  
> 
>  > In exchange, I would be ok with dropping the zynq_qmtech board and
>  > possibly one of the zynq_zed
>  > boards.  
> 
> I think the main issue with a lot of defconfigs is maintaining them (but
> you already do that) and the CI overhead from building all of them.
> 
> I guess we could come up with some logic to skip some of the zynq*
> defconfigs from the Gitlab CI setup. Romain, any good ideas?

After the discussion it seems quite clear that the patch is useful, and
the CI aspects can perhaps be sorted out, so:

Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot