From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: "Michael Nosthoff" <buildroot@heine.tech>
Cc: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com>,
Michael Nosthoff via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/sqlitecpp: new package
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240710163928.4fd390b1@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25518-668e5180-5-147108a0@236288521>
Hello Michael,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 11:16:24 +0200
"Michael Nosthoff" <buildroot@heine.tech> wrote:
> One additional thing: This library requires C++11, I think all compilers we have currently in buildroot should
> be recent enough to support it. Or do we need a gcc version check here as well?
We need a gcc version check. Which version depends on which C++11
features are used. Some packages need gcc 4.7, some gcc 4.8, some gcc
4.9:
package/cli11/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11
package/clpeak/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11
package/cutelyst/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11
package/docopt-cpp/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 # C++11
package/edid-decode/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 # C++11
package/efl/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # C++11
etc.
some even need gcc 5.x:
package/qt5/Config.in: depends on BR2_HOST_GCC_AT_LEAST_5 # Full C++11
> Related: I'm currently looking at bumping boost. And in the last versions many libs dropped their support for C++98.
> So if we could just rely on the availability of C++11 this would make this much easier.
If that also requires a gcc version dependency, then we would have to
add it to Boost, and then to all its reverse dependencies:
package/azmq/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/bitcoin/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/cc-tool/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/domoticz/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/gnuradio/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/gqrx/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/i2pd/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libcamera-apps/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libcamera/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libcpprestsdk/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libftdi/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libftdi1/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libosmium/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libserial/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/libtorrent-rasterbar/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/mongodb/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/mpd/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/osm2pgsql/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/pulseview/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/python-libconfig/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/resiprocate/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/supertux/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/thrift/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/uhd/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
package/zmqpp/Config.in: select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
and then recursively to their reverse dependencies. It's a bit of work,
but I believe it's inevitable that at some point Boost, being a complex
C++ library, will require a certain version of gcc.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-10 8:13 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/sqlitecpp: new package Michael Nosthoff via buildroot
2024-07-10 8:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2024-07-10 9:16 ` Michael Nosthoff via buildroot
2024-07-10 14:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2024-07-10 15:42 ` Michael Nosthoff via buildroot
2024-07-10 20:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240710163928.4fd390b1@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=buildroot@heine.tech \
--cc=s.martin49@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox