Re: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.org] Your daily results for 2025-02-07

Re: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.org] Your daily results for 2025-02-07

[Petr Vorel]

Hi all,

> Hello,

> Autobuilder failures
> ====================

> Below is a list of build failures reported by the Buildroot autobuilders
> in relation to packages or CPU architectures you are in charge of.
> Please help us improving the quality of Buildroot by investigating those
> build failures and sending patches to fix them.

> Results for the 'master' branch
> -------------------------------

> Build failures related to your packages:

>     arch     |             reason             |                                       url                                      
> -------------+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     arc      |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/609697d89e0c5948842c7c0e5dcec4d93be3258e
>    arceb     |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/8814f6f166ad6ddd58e8627964d147ecfff4d76f
>    xtensa    |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/05728d3609553a0b78875d62adb88cccb43e00ed

All are uclibc-ng, problem. Nadav suggests [1] it's caused by the fact that time64
on 32-bit targets is not supported on Linux < 5.1.0. I'm not sure why this is
just on uclibc-ng. Should I bump min kernel headers for uclibc-ng >= 5.1.0?

Kind regards,
Petr

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/Z5q7NwweeZ0iNlzc@nadav-dell/

> Thanks for your contribution to Buildroot!
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.org] Your daily results for 2025-02-07

[Nadav Tasher]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 05:46:34AM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> > Hello,
> 
> > Autobuilder failures
> > ====================
> 
> > Below is a list of build failures reported by the Buildroot autobuilders
> > in relation to packages or CPU architectures you are in charge of.
> > Please help us improving the quality of Buildroot by investigating those
> > build failures and sending patches to fix them.
> 
> > Results for the 'master' branch
> > -------------------------------
> 
> > Build failures related to your packages:
> 
> >     arch     |             reason             |                                       url                                      
> > -------------+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     arc      |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/609697d89e0c5948842c7c0e5dcec4d93be3258e
> >    arceb     |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/8814f6f166ad6ddd58e8627964d147ecfff4d76f
> >    xtensa    |     ltp-testsuite-20250130     | https://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/05728d3609553a0b78875d62adb88cccb43e00ed
> 
> All are uclibc-ng, problem. Nadav suggests [1] it's caused by the fact that time64
> on 32-bit targets is not supported on Linux < 5.1.0. I'm not sure why this is
> just on uclibc-ng. Should I bump min kernel headers for uclibc-ng >= 5.1.0?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/Z5q7NwweeZ0iNlzc@nadav-dell/
> 
> > Thanks for your contribution to Buildroot!
Hi Petr,
Linux 5.1.0 is only the minimal headers version when TIME64 is enabled for
uclibc-ng.
Is there a way to make it so that it is only affected when TIME64 is enabled?
I think this would be a little complicated since TIME64 is enabled by default.

I guess making 5.1.0 the minimal for uclibc-ng would solve the issue, but it
might impose some limitations for people trying to compile newer versions
of Buildroot with older versions of Linux.

Nadav
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot