[Buildroot] Status of defconfigs

[Buildroot] Status of defconfigs

[Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot]

Hello,

I analyzed the results of the Gitlab CI pipeline for the last defconfig
build. The full details are below, but the summary is:

- 2 more patches sent to drop two additional at91/atmel defconfigs

- pine64_star64 has some patches on the mailing list from Thomas
  Bonnefille that fix the issues => to be reviewed/merged

- raspberrypi3_qt5we is always too long to build (it includes Webkit).
  Drop the defconfig? Exclude it from Gitlab CI testing?

- beagleboneai and roseapplepi are waiting for fixes from Peter

- snps_archs38_hsdk has only very recently started failing (a week ago)
  and I don't see what recent changes could have broken it. Ideas?

- ts4900 has a build failure in glibc due to the version of the kernel
  headers being used. But that seems like a real issue in glibc, not
  actually a defconfig issue as any other build using the same kernel
  headers version would fail in the same way

Thomas

at91sam9260eknf_defconfig			=> patch sent to drop
orangepi_lite2_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
pcengines_apu2_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
imx6ulz_bsh_smm_m2_defconfig			=> false positive, job restarted
at91sam9g45m10ek_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
at91sam9rlek_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
atmel_sama5d3xek_defconfig			=> patch sent to drop
beelink_gs1_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
bananapro_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
engicam_imx6qdl_icore_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
engicam_imx6qdl_icore_rqs_defconfig		=> removed after pipeline was started
rock64_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
pine64_star64_defconfig				=> patches from Thomas Bonnefille to review/merge
at91sam9g20dfc_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
pine64_sopine_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
raspberrypicm4io_64_defconfig			=> false positive, job restarted
raspberrypi3_qt5we_defconfig			=> this job is too long. Should we drop from CI testing?
engicam_imx6ul_geam_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
chromebook_snow_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
beagleboneai_defconfig				=> waiting for fixes from Peter Korsgaard
engicam_imx6ul_isiot_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
engicam_imx6qdl_icore_qt5_defconfig		=> removed after pipeline was started
galileo_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
odroidxu4_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
orangepi_one_plus_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
riotboard_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
ts7680_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
rock_pi_n8_defconfig				=> removed after pipeline was started
snps_archs38_hsdk_defconfig			=> this defconfig was building a week ago. Weird?!?
						   https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs?name=T%3Dsnps_archs38_hsdk&kind=BUILD
sipeed_licheepi_zero_defconfig			=> fixed by Julien
toradex_apalis_imx6_defconfig			=> removed after pipeline was started
ts4900_defconfig				=> causing a glibc build failure, not due to the defconfig
roseapplepi_defconfig				=> waiting for fixes from Peter Korsgaard

-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Re: [Buildroot] Status of defconfigs

[Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot]

Hello,

On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:11:50 +0200
Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org> wrote:

> - 2 more patches sent to drop two additional at91/atmel defconfigs
> 
> - pine64_star64 has some patches on the mailing list from Thomas
>   Bonnefille that fix the issues => to be reviewed/merged
> 
> - raspberrypi3_qt5we is always too long to build (it includes Webkit).
>   Drop the defconfig? Exclude it from Gitlab CI testing?
> 
> - beagleboneai and roseapplepi are waiting for fixes from Peter
> 
> - snps_archs38_hsdk has only very recently started failing (a week ago)
>   and I don't see what recent changes could have broken it. Ideas?
> 
> - ts4900 has a build failure in glibc due to the version of the kernel
>   headers being used. But that seems like a real issue in glibc, not
>   actually a defconfig issue as any other build using the same kernel
>   headers version would fail in the same way

Updated status, 8 failures:

https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/pipelines/2020535236/failures

Basically, same status, except the pine64_star64 which is odd since I
don't see the patches merged in master.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot