Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf: apply patch to compile for PowerPC
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:32:06 -0200 (BRST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2127002292.1917904.1455121926734.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160210165700.7f97a29c@free-electrons.com>

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> To: "Carlos Santos" <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
> Cc: buildroot at buildroot.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 1:57:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf: apply patch to compile for PowerPC

> Dear Carlos Santos,
> 
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:25:49 -0200 (BRST), Carlos Santos wrote:
> 
>> > config BR2_PACKAGE_PROTOBUF_ARCH_SUPPORTS
>> >        bool
>> >        default y if BR2_arm
>> >        default y if BR2_i386
>> >        default y if BR2_mipsel
>> >        default y if BR2_x86_64
>> 
>> These architecture checks would be superseded by the BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC
>> boolean.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
>> >	default y if BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ATOMIC
>> >        depends on BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86_64" || BR2_HOSTARCH = "x86"
>> > 
>> > *and* ensure protobuf gets linked with -latomic.
>> 
>> Hum, this requires a patch on configure.ac that that would hardly be accepted
>> upstream.
> 
> Why? If they use __atomic_*() built-ins, then they must link with
> libatomic if it exists, since __atomic_*() built-ins are not guaranteed
> to be available on all architectures if you don't link with libatomic.
> 
> Look for example at the Android NDK documentation, which says that you
> should link with libatomic when using <atomic> in C++ :
> 
>  http://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/cpp-support.html
> 
> (search for "atomic support").

The problem is the same you found on mpd (commit 84533029c70a4dffb2cd2e4f05e3903fd1b8fcd9) in branch master. With the patch in configure.ac I get this:

$ owerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe-ldd --root target/ target/usr/bin/protoc
        libprotobuf.so.9 => /usr/lib/libprotobuf.so.9 (0xdeadbeef)
        libatomic.so.1 => /lib/libatomic.so.1 (0xdeadbeef)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xdeadbeef)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xdeadbeef)
        ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0xdeadbeef)
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xdeadbeef)
        libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xdeadbeef)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xdeadbeef)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xdeadbeef)
        libprotoc.so.9 => /usr/lib/libprotoc.so.9 (0xdeadbeef)

Without the patch protoc is not linked to libatomic.so.1.

Carlos Santos (Casantos)
DATACOM, P&D

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-10 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 13:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf: apply patch to compile for PowerPC Carlos Santos
2016-02-04 23:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-05 11:04   ` Henrique Marks
2016-02-05 13:09     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-05 13:22       ` Henrique Marks
2016-02-05 13:37         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-07 21:19         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-10 15:25   ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 15:57     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-10 16:32       ` Carlos Santos [this message]
2016-02-10 16:44         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-10 16:50           ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 18:30           ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 20:13             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-11 15:14               ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 15:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] protobuf: fix detection of __atomic_*() built-ins Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 15:50   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-10 18:42     ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-10 20:06       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-10 20:00   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-11 14:56     ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-11 15:23   ` Carlos Santos
2016-02-17 17:43     ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/1] " Carlos Santos
2016-02-17 17:43       ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Carlos Santos
2016-02-27 21:55         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-03-20 22:43         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-17 18:33       ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/1] " Carlos Santos
2016-02-17 20:51         ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2127002292.1917904.1455121926734.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br \
    --to=casantos@datacom.ind.br \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox