* [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t?
@ 2008-10-19 0:37 Hai Zaar
[not found] ` <22738895.post@talk.nabble.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hai Zaar @ 2008-10-19 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Good day!
I'm building two weeks old buildroot snapshot for AT91SAM9260 board.
All I do it:
make at91sam9260dfc_defconfig
make menuconfig (select arm926t, EABI and remove games, etc...)
make
Results:
All kernels from 2.6.25 and later finish boot like this:
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
Freeing init memory: 128K
Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
The only kernel that worked is 2.6.24. After checking the kernel
config, I've found out that CONFIG_AEABI was not set (in spite of EABI
being selected in buildroot's config). Disabling EABI on later
kernels, (or enabling CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT) made them (almost)work.
Currently the situation is as follows:
EABI kernel + EABI rootfs = kernel panic (busibox's linuxrc dies)
EABI kernel + OABI rootfs = kernel panic (busibox's linuxrc dies)
OABI kernel + EABI rootfs = works, but some things like ping and nfs
return 'Illegal instruction'
EABI+OABI_COMPAT kernel + EABI rootfs = works, but some things like
ping and nfs return 'Illegal instruction'
EABI+OABI_COMPAT kernel + OABI rootfs = work correctly
OABI kernel + OABI rootfs = works correctly
1. Is EABI support broken for this platform in buildroot?
2. How can further investigate this issue?
--
Zaar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t?
[not found] ` <22738895.post@talk.nabble.com>
@ 2009-03-28 6:59 ` kelvincheung
2009-03-30 8:42 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: kelvincheung @ 2009-03-28 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
I fond the sulotion:
http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/buildroot/2007-June/003189.html
To us EABI for ARM920T in the buildroot, two options are needed to the main
buildroot config:
BR2_EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-arch=armv4t"
BR2_EXTRA_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-arch=armv4t"
or
BR2_EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-cpu=arm920t"
BR2_EXTRA_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-cpu=arm920t"
kelvincheung wrote:
>
> I have the same problem.
> My buildroot version is: buildroot-2009.02
> Any one know the solution?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Hai Zaar-2 wrote:
>>
>> Good day!
>> I'm building two weeks old buildroot snapshot for AT91SAM9260 board.
>>
>> All I do it:
>> make at91sam9260dfc_defconfig
>> make menuconfig (select arm926t, EABI and remove games, etc...)
>> make
>>
>> Results:
>> All kernels from 2.6.25 and later finish boot like this:
>> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
>> Freeing init memory: 128K
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>>
>> The only kernel that worked is 2.6.24. After checking the kernel
>> config, I've found out that CONFIG_AEABI was not set (in spite of EABI
>> being selected in buildroot's config). Disabling EABI on later
>> kernels, (or enabling CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT) made them (almost)work.
>>
>> Currently the situation is as follows:
>>
>> EABI kernel + EABI rootfs = kernel panic (busibox's linuxrc dies)
>> EABI kernel + OABI rootfs = kernel panic (busibox's linuxrc dies)
>> OABI kernel + EABI rootfs = works, but some things like ping and nfs
>> return 'Illegal instruction'
>> EABI+OABI_COMPAT kernel + EABI rootfs = works, but some things like
>> ping and nfs return 'Illegal instruction'
>> EABI+OABI_COMPAT kernel + OABI rootfs = work correctly
>> OABI kernel + OABI rootfs = works correctly
>>
>> 1. Is EABI support broken for this platform in buildroot?
>> 2. How can further investigate this issue?
>>
>> --
>> Zaar
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot at uclibc.org
>> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EABI-broken-on-arm926t--tp20052144p22754259.html
Sent from the BuildRoot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t?
2009-03-28 6:59 ` kelvincheung
@ 2009-03-30 8:42 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-03-30 10:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2009-03-30 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "kelvincheung" == kelvincheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> writes:
Hi,
kelvincheung> I fond the sulotion:
kelvincheung> http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/buildroot/2007-June/003189.html
kelvincheung> To us EABI for ARM920T in the buildroot, two options are needed to the main
kelvincheung> buildroot config:
kelvincheung> BR2_EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-arch=armv4t"
Really? Binutils afaik doesn't support an --with-arch configure
option.
kelvincheung> BR2_EXTRA_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-arch=armv4t"
kelvincheung> or
kelvincheung> BR2_EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-cpu=arm920t"
kelvincheung> BR2_EXTRA_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS="--with-cpu=arm920t"
I've fixed the GCC_TARGET_ARCH table for ARM in r25889 - Could you
give it a try to verify?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t?
2009-03-30 8:42 ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2009-03-30 10:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-05-11 7:33 ` Kelvin Cheung
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2009-03-30 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes:
Hi,
Peter> I've fixed the GCC_TARGET_ARCH table for ARM in r25889 - Could you
Peter> give it a try to verify?
Sorry, make that r25890.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t?
2009-03-30 10:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
@ 2009-05-11 7:33 ` Kelvin Cheung
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kelvin Cheung @ 2009-05-11 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
2009/3/30 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
> >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter> I've fixed the GCC_TARGET_ARCH table for ARM in r25889 - Could you
> Peter> give it a try to verify?
>
> Sorry, make that r25890.
>
> --
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard
>
It works for me now.
Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20090511/ae5c6b2a/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-11 7:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-19 0:37 [Buildroot] EABI broken on arm926t? Hai Zaar
[not found] ` <22738895.post@talk.nabble.com>
2009-03-28 6:59 ` kelvincheung
2009-03-30 8:42 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-03-30 10:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-05-11 7:33 ` Kelvin Cheung
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox