[Buildroot] [PATCH] nodejs: new package

[Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>]

Hi Thomas,

On 12/08/2012 5:06 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> It would be better if Node.js could use the OpenSSL version that is in
> Buildroot rather than its own internal one. It avoids having two copies
> of OpenSSL on the target system.
>
> And yes, if the SSL support can be enabled/disabled easily, it would be
> great: OpenSSL is a fairly heavy dependency.
Done.
>
>>>> diff --git a/package/nodejs/nodejs.mk b/package/nodejs/nodejs.mk
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..8a0fa91
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/package/nodejs/nodejs.mk
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
>>>> +#############################################################
>>>> +#
>>>> +# nodejs
>>>> +#
>>>> +#############################################################
>>>> +NODEJS_VERSION = 0.8.6
>>>> +NODEJS_SOURCE = node-v$(NODEJS_VERSION).tar.gz
>>>> +NODEJS_SITE = http://nodejs.org/dist/v$(NODEJS_VERSION)
>>>> +NODEJS_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
>>> Does NodeJS contains libraries required by other packages?
>> The headers and node-waf binary are needed to build 3rd party native
>> modules. I figured it may be useful if someone wants to create buildroot
>> packages for node.js modules in the future.
> Can you add a comment with a similar explanation just before this line.
> For libraries, the reason to have _INSTALL_STAGING is fairly obvious,
> for things like nodejs, it's a little bit less obvious for the ones who
> are not familiar with what nodejs is.
Done.

I've submitted the updated patch as V3.

Regards,
Jonathan