Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3] oprofile: upstep 0.9.7 patches to 0.9.8
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:12:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140DD96.3040104@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LXwyWv2KfQ3OW=KNYm7SN+y++79puqeN=C+yR50M-f5cw@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/13/13 09:27, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:10:55 +0100, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>>
>>> rename from package/oprofile/oprofile-0.9.7-002-no-query-modules.patch
>>> rename to package/oprofile/oprofile-0.9.8-002-no-query-modules.patch
>>
>> We no longer want the version number in patch file names, for precisely
>> the reason why you're doing this patch in the first place :-)
>
> Are we already making these changes, or are we waiting for someone to
> fix the central patching code according to the new rules first?

  There is nothing to be fixed in the central patching code (at least not 
for this use case). Remove the version number.

  Regards,
  Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-12 18:10 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3] Fix oprofile build on powerpc Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-12 18:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1 of 3] libpfm4: new package Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-18 21:16   ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-03-12 18:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3] oprofile: upstep 0.9.7 patches to 0.9.8 Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-13  7:24   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-13  8:27     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-13 20:12       ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-03-14  7:49         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-18 21:20   ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-03-12 18:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3 of 3] oprofile 0.9.8: fix compilation on powerpc Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-12 20:20   ` Reuben Dowle
2013-03-13 16:14     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-13 20:18       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-03-13  7:28 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0 of 3] Fix oprofile build " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-13  8:38   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-03-15 10:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5140DD96.3040104@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox