* [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? @ 2013-10-08 22:19 Sagaert Johan 2013-10-08 22:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2013-10-09 16:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sagaert Johan @ 2013-10-08 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Hi I noticed when using SITE_METHOD = file, the package is copied to the download directory. Is this needed, since the package is already on our local filesystem ? Sagaert Johan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? 2013-10-08 22:19 [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? Sagaert Johan @ 2013-10-08 22:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2013-10-08 23:12 ` Sagaert Johan 2013-10-09 16:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-10-08 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dear Sagaert Johan, On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:19:12 +0200, Sagaert Johan wrote: > I noticed when using SITE_METHOD = file, the package is copied to the download directory. > Is this needed, since the package is already on our local filesystem ? Yes it is needed, because: (1) Buildroot do not want to make changes outside of its output directory. We clearly do not want Buildroot to mess up with your source directory, and create its stamp files, and the result of the compilation there. (2) Buildroot does not use out of tree build for packages. If it was using out of tree build, then we could avoid that copy by using your local directory as the source tree, and the output/build/<pkgname>-<pkgversion> directory as the build tree. A while ago, I started working on out-of-tree build for packages, precisely to improve this situation. See http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-April/070573.html. It is certainly not impossible to do, but quite a huge patch set, with a lot of implications. Basically, my stuff was working in the general case, but there were some issues here and there that remained to be sorted out. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? 2013-10-08 22:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-10-08 23:12 ` Sagaert Johan 2013-10-09 0:06 ` Ryan Barnett 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sagaert Johan @ 2013-10-08 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Dear Thomas Maybe I did not explain it well, I did not mean to build out of the tree, but the local package_xxx_tar.bz2 (in the case of tarred bz2) is already on our local system, so I tought there was no need to copy the archive to the dl directory. Johan -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: buildroot-bounces at busybox.net [mailto:buildroot-bounces at busybox.net] Namens Thomas Petazzoni Verzonden: woensdag 9 oktober 2013 0:24 Aan: buildroot at busybox.net Onderwerp: Re: [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? Dear Sagaert Johan, On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:19:12 +0200, Sagaert Johan wrote: > I noticed when using SITE_METHOD = file, the package is copied to the download directory. > Is this needed, since the package is already on our local filesystem ? Yes it is needed, because: (1) Buildroot do not want to make changes outside of its output directory. We clearly do not want Buildroot to mess up with your source directory, and create its stamp files, and the result of the compilation there. (2) Buildroot does not use out of tree build for packages. If it was using out of tree build, then we could avoid that copy by using your local directory as the source tree, and the output/build/<pkgname>-<pkgversion> directory as the build tree. A while ago, I started working on out-of-tree build for packages, precisely to improve this situation. See http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-April/070573.html. It is certainly not impossible to do, but quite a huge patch set, with a lot of implications. Basically, my stuff was working in the general case, but there were some issues here and there that remained to be sorted out. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? 2013-10-08 23:12 ` Sagaert Johan @ 2013-10-09 0:06 ` Ryan Barnett 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ryan Barnett @ 2013-10-09 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot Sagaert, Sagaert Johan <sagaert.johan@skynet.be> wrote on 10/08/2013 06:12:20 PM: > Dear Thomas > > Maybe I did not explain it well, I did not mean to build out of the > tree, but the local package_xxx_tar.bz2 (in the case of tarred > bz2) > is already on our local system, so I tought there was no need to copy > the archive to the dl directory. I believe you need to utilize the feature of specifying the DL directory out-of-tree (outside of the buildroot source). Please see the manual: http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#_location_of_downloaded_packages Finally when you specify the DL directory, copy or move the package_xx_tar.bz2 to the BR2_DL_DIR location. The reason the your tar file get copied to this location is because buildroot's goal is to have every external file it depends on in one location. This is an important feature because it makes it easy for us to have all the packages in one location when we redistribute/release a system put together using buildroot. > Johan Thanks, -Ryan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ryan J Barnett / Software Engineer / Platform SW MS 137-157, 855 35th St NE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52498-3161, US rjbarnet at rockwellcollins.com www.rockwellcollins.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? 2013-10-08 22:19 [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? Sagaert Johan 2013-10-08 22:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-10-09 16:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Arnout Vandecappelle @ 2013-10-09 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot On 10/09/13 00:19, Sagaert Johan wrote: > Hi > > > I noticed when using SITE_METHOD = file, the package is copied to the download directory. > Is this needed, since the package is already on our local filesystem ? It seems the other two repliers missed your point :-) There is no fundamental need to copy it. However, it makes buildroot a lot simpler. In many places there are direct references to DL_DIR (just grep for that variable); in case of a file SITE_METHOD, you'd have to use $(PKG)_SITE instead of DL_DIR. It is possible to use hardlinking or symlinking instead of copying. Buildroot provides the BR2_LOCALFILES config option for that (in Build options -> Commands). Just set that to "ln" for hard linking or "ln -s" for symlinking. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-09 16:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-10-08 22:19 [Buildroot] using a local package file : why copy it to the dl directory ? Sagaert Johan 2013-10-08 22:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2013-10-08 23:12 ` Sagaert Johan 2013-10-09 0:06 ` Ryan Barnett 2013-10-09 16:02 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox