Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libtool: revert a commit which re-introduced an already fixed problem
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:50:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5329A0A3.9020805@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53296606.9070104@imgtec.com>

On 19/03/14 10:40, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> On 03/19/2014 07:54 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>> On 03/18/14 11:44, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>>> On 03/18/2014 07:46 AM, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>>> On 03/17/14 23:08, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
>>>>>>>>>> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>    > The commit ed73d1d2e3703290e74bb076bc6dd0417aa3ba21 modified the
>>>>> changes
>>>>>    > made by the commit 4268d3967e2d691c151d6b5629e4051deb077b9a. The
>>>>> problem
>>>>>    > that was fixed by the former commit is present again due to those
>>>>>    > modifications. This patch reverts those modifications to have that
>>>>>    > problem fixed again.
>>>>>
>>>>>    > Fixes:
>>>>>    >
>>>>> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b86/b86a83c6549004f226e7255242e54ef4e50c5ec3/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So this basically just reverts Arnouts fix for old automake
>>>>> versions? Do
>>>>> we understand why it doesn't work? Can we come up with a solution that
>>>>> both fixes the n64 issue and old automake?
>>>>
>>>>    I indeed never tested if the issue of 4268d39 was still fixed. I just
>>>> understood from the commit message that it is only relevant for the
>>>> libtool.m4 that is installed in the host dir, so I made use of that.
>>>>
>>>>    It should be rather easy to get this right then: a patch that
>>>> fixes up
>>>> configure directly, rather than libtool.m4.
>>>
>>> Hello Arnout,
>>>
>>> how do you suggest to do it? Requiring an older automake would not be
>>> possible because of this:
>>>
>>> dnl These are bootstrap requirements! Once built, libtool may work with
>>> dnl much older releases of autoconf and automake.  See release notes.
>>> dnl 1.11 is needed for color-tests, 1.11.1 fixes a security issue.
>>> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.11.1 gnu subdir-objects dist-xz color-tests
>>> parallel-tests])
>>
>>   I meant: create a patch that fixes up the configure script directly.
>>
>>   Can you give me a minimal defconfig that shows the problem (preferably
>> using an external toolchain, e.g. from the autobuilders)? Then I can try
>> to create that patch.
> 
> Hello Arnout,
> 
> unfortunately I don't have a minimal defconfig to reproduce that failure.
> I use the one in the autobuild:
> 
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b86/b86a83c6549004f226e7255242e54ef4e50c5ec3/

 Okay, the issue is that that defconfig enables libtool for the target,
and autoreconf adds $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/share/aclocal to the include path.
So the unpatched libtool will take precedence.

 Patch follows.

 Regards,
 Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-19 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-17 17:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH] libtool: revert a commit which re-introduced an already fixed problem Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-17 22:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-03-18  7:46   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-18 10:44     ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-18 10:55       ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-19  7:54       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-19  9:40         ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-19 13:50           ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2014-03-19 14:41             ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-19 15:02               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-19 15:07                 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-19 16:23                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5329A0A3.9020805@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox