From: "Arnaud Rébillout" <rebillout@syscom.ch>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] dbus-triggerd: new package
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:01:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53327B4B.2010005@syscom.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5331E316.4030706@mind.be>
Hi Arnout,
> For the other dbus-* packages, the dbus dependencies are repeated (even
> though they're automatic because of the depends on DBUS). So I would do
> that here as well. And that means of course that there should also be a
> comment in case of missing toolchain features. See dbus-cpp for an example.
You're right, I forgot the comments, and the host-pkgconf dependency as
well.
I will do as you suggest for the DBUS dependencies.
> Patch misses a description + Signed-off-by.
Correct.
> If you're anyway patching the Makefile, you can just as well make it:
>
> CFLAGS?=-Wall -O3
> CFLAGS+=`$(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags dbus-1`
> LDLIBS+=`$(PKG_CONFIG) --libs dbus-1`
>
>
>
> Will you send this patch upstream?
Yep. I will send a patch right now.
> This should be $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) which includes all of the above
> and more.
OK. Actually, I've always been wondering it was OK to use
TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS in a generic package, I never dared to do it.
> Note BTW that the patch above refers to LDLIBS instead of LDFLAGS. Is
> LDFLAGS used?
Yep, LDFLAGS is used automatically by Make in this Makefile.
Thanks for your comments, I will send the patch upstream a wait a little
for the author's comments on it.
Regards
--
Arnaud R?billout
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20140326/f245da9a/attachment.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-26 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-25 7:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/1] dbus-triggerd, a helpful little daemon Arnaud Rébillout
2014-03-25 7:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] dbus-triggerd: new package Arnaud Rébillout
2014-03-25 20:12 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-26 7:01 ` Arnaud Rébillout [this message]
2014-03-26 7:46 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53327B4B.2010005@syscom.ch \
--to=rebillout@syscom.ch \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox