From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] Disable o32 ABI for MIPS64 architectures
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:41:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533551D2.2010003@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5335510C.3090006@imgtec.com>
On 03/28/2014 10:38 AM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 10:27 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 03/28/2014 09:51 AM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>>> On 03/28/2014 12:02 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>>> On 03/27/2014 05:56, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>>>>> On 03/26/2014 09:28 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> +config BR2_MIPS_OABI32
>>>>>> >>> + bool
>>>>>> >>> + default y if BR2_mips || BR2_mipsel
>>>>>> >>> + default n if BR2_mips64 || BR2_mips64el
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Did you forget to remove this or is there a reason to keep it?
>>>>>> In the
>>>>>> >> latter case, please add an explanatory comment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Why would I want to remove this? The BR2_MIPS_OABI32 symbol is
>>>>>> used by
>>>>>> > glibc and uclibc packages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arnout is just asking about the 'default n' line. Symbols are 'n' by
>>>>>> default, so the line doesn't do anything as far as I can see.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have maintained that line because if you remove it and then select
>>>>> any
>>>>> MIPS64 target, the "# BR2_MIPS_OABI32 is not set" is not present on
>>>>> the
>>>>> .config file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't that a problem?
>>>>
>>>> Is the definition of BR2_MIPS_OABI32 missing completely, or do you see
>>>> "BR2_MIPS_OABI32=y"? If it's missing completely, then it's virtually
>>>> the
>>>> same as it being there as a comment, which will get stripped
>>>> out/ignored by
>>>> the build system. Kconfig/Kbuild (whatever it is called) only cares
>>>> if the
>>>> symbol is defined to "y". I believe that is then checked for in
>>>> Makefiles
>>>> and is in a generated config.h file for use as a C #define.
>>>>
>>>> That's how it works in the Linux kernel at least...
>>>
>>> If you remove the "default 'n'" line, and you select a MIPS64 target,
>>> then "BR2_MIPS_OABI32=y" is completely missing in the .config file.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That's not a problem is it? It's ok if the line is missing. A missing
>> line means "this option is not available". A line starting with "#"
>> means "the option is available but currently disabled"
>
> I want to be sure about that, because there are packages which use the
> BR2_MIPS_OABI32 symbol. So, maybe having that line starting with "#"
> means BR2_MIPS_OABI32=n, and everything works fine, and don't having
> that line at all means that symbol is not defined and the packages which
> use that symbol fail because of that. That's what I want to know.
>
I think not having that line, or having that line but prefixed with "#"
is the same thing as far as the Kconfig dependencies are concerned.
(pretty much what Joshua said already)
--
markos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-26 14:15 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] Disable o32 ABI for MIPS64 architectures Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-26 17:18 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-26 18:03 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-26 21:28 ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-03-27 9:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-28 0:02 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-03-28 9:51 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-28 10:27 ` Markos Chandras
2014-03-28 10:38 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-28 10:41 ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2014-03-28 10:52 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-03-28 11:01 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2014-03-28 11:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533551D2.2010003@imgtec.com \
--to=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox