From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qwt: compile as a static lib if QT_SHARED is not selected
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C7F84D.7050006@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87siey4i48.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
On 25/01/15 23:20, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
[snip]
> > I think we should get rid of BR2_PACKAGE_QT_SHARED completely, and use
> > BR2_STATIC_LIBS here instead.
>
> I agree that it would be cleaner, but the reason the explicit QT_SHARED
> stuff was added was afaik a lot of systems only needed Qt in a single
> application / that application only used a subset of the Qt
> functionality, so having a static libQt while everything else was shared
> was quite a big win in size / startup time.
But can't you just build with BR2_SHARED_STATIC_LIBS and link your application
with --static? That's what BR2_SHARED_STATIC_LIBS was meant for, right?
Regards,
Arnout
>
> It does complicate LGPL compliance and I don't know if the disk space
> concerns are as big these days though.
>
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-27 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 10:17 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qwt: compile as a static lib if QT_SHARED is not selected Richard Genoud
2015-01-20 10:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] qwt: add license information Richard Genoud
2015-01-20 16:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-20 16:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qwt: compile as a static lib if QT_SHARED is not selected Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-23 16:00 ` Richard Genoud
2015-01-23 16:06 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-01-23 16:19 ` Richard Genoud
2015-01-25 22:20 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-01-26 9:34 ` Richard Genoud
2015-01-26 9:54 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-01-26 10:16 ` Richard Genoud
2015-01-26 11:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-26 17:00 ` Richard Genoud
2015-01-26 17:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-01-27 20:42 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2015-01-27 20:55 ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-01-28 9:35 ` Richard Genoud
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C7F84D.7050006@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox