Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc
@ 2015-03-17 22:21 Gustavo Zacarias
  2015-03-20 20:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Zacarias @ 2015-03-17 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

It's broken as well, wants to emit v9 asm.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
---
 package/glibc/Config.in | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/package/glibc/Config.in b/package/glibc/Config.in
index 53cd958..8cc8cce 100644
--- a/package/glibc/Config.in
+++ b/package/glibc/Config.in
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ choice
 
 config BR2_EGLIBC_VERSION_2_18
 	bool "2.18-svnr23787"
+	# Build breakage
+	depends on !BR2_sparc
 
 config BR2_EGLIBC_VERSION_2_19
 	bool "2.19-svnr25243"
-- 
2.0.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc
  2015-03-17 22:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc Gustavo Zacarias
@ 2015-03-20 20:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
  2015-03-20 20:56   ` Gustavo Zacarias
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-03-20 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:21:00 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> It's broken as well, wants to emit v9 asm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
> ---
>  package/glibc/Config.in | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Applied, but shouldn't we simply deprecated eglibc ? The latest eglibc
release was 2.19, and glibc has already made two releases (2.20 and
2.21) since then.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc
  2015-03-20 20:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-03-20 20:56   ` Gustavo Zacarias
  2015-03-20 21:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Zacarias @ 2015-03-20 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

On 03/20/2015 05:50 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Applied, but shouldn't we simply deprecated eglibc ? The latest eglibc
> release was 2.19, and glibc has already made two releases (2.20 and
> 2.21) since then.

Unfortunately eglibc 2.18 is the only (e)glibc that's good for powerpc
SPE at the moment (that does hard-float), so that would mean leaving
only uClibc for that scenario.
Regards.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc
  2015-03-20 20:56   ` Gustavo Zacarias
@ 2015-03-20 21:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
  2015-03-20 23:00       ` Gustavo Zacarias
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2015-03-20 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:56:25 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:

> > Applied, but shouldn't we simply deprecated eglibc ? The latest eglibc
> > release was 2.19, and glibc has already made two releases (2.20 and
> > 2.21) since then.
> 
> Unfortunately eglibc 2.18 is the only (e)glibc that's good for powerpc
> SPE at the moment (that does hard-float), so that would mean leaving
> only uClibc for that scenario.

Well if nobody cares about powerpc SPE in upstream glibc, using uClibc
will be the only solution.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc
  2015-03-20 21:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2015-03-20 23:00       ` Gustavo Zacarias
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Zacarias @ 2015-03-20 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: buildroot

On 03/20/2015 06:10 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Well if nobody cares about powerpc SPE in upstream glibc, using uClibc
> will be the only solution.

From what i've read there was a effort to get soft-fp going for that
which makes sense because E500v1 is only single-precision and E500v2 is
double, to make them ABI compatible.
I'll dig and get back on it since keeping eglibc around might not be a
good idea long-term.
Regards.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-20 23:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-17 22:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH] glibc: disable eglibc 2.18 for sparc Gustavo Zacarias
2015-03-20 20:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-20 20:56   ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-03-20 21:10     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-20 23:00       ` Gustavo Zacarias

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox