From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH V4] sdl2: new package
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 00:22:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559C5142.3090506@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435824981-6312-1-git-send-email-guillaume.gardet@oliseo.fr>
On 07/02/15 10:16, Guillaume GARDET wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet@oliseo.fr>
> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@openwide.fr>
> Cc: Yann E. Morin <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Since you're anyway spinning a v5, one more comment:
>
> ---
[snip]
> diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
> index 13a7e74..3a1b5c6 100644
> --- a/package/Config.in
> +++ b/package/Config.in
> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ endif
> source "package/psplash/Config.in"
> source "package/sawman/Config.in"
> source "package/sdl/Config.in"
> + source "package/sdl2/Config.in"
Even though this is correct alphabetical ordering, it's not so good. Currently,
when you select sdl, the SDL modules, below, will be indented in menuconfig so
it is clear they belong to the SDL package. By putting sdl2 in-between, the
indentation will be gone.
Actually, the sdl_* packages should not have this 'depends on ' line but
instead there should be a condition here, then it would be much clearer. But
it's not a perfect world...
Regards,
Arnout
> source "package/sdl_gfx/Config.in"
> source "package/sdl_image/Config.in"
> source "package/sdl_mixer/Config.in"
[snip]
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 9:47 [Buildroot] [PATCH] sdl2: new package Guillaume GARDET
2015-03-13 10:39 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-03-13 16:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-30 9:33 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-03-30 12:50 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-03-30 12:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-03-30 13:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V2] " Guillaume GARDET
2015-04-22 8:35 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-04-22 22:11 ` Romain Naour
2015-06-29 20:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V3] " Guillaume GARDET
2015-06-29 22:22 ` Yann E. MORIN
2015-07-02 8:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V4] " Guillaume GARDET
2015-07-05 18:21 ` Romain Naour
2015-07-06 12:17 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-07-06 12:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-06 13:23 ` Guillaume GARDET - Oliséo
2015-07-06 13:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-07 22:19 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2015-07-18 18:57 ` Romain Naour
2015-10-19 13:45 ` Vincent Stehlé
2015-10-21 20:56 ` Romain Naour
2015-10-21 21:09 ` Romain Naour
2015-10-21 21:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-21 21:25 ` Romain Naour
2015-07-07 22:22 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2015-05-03 15:03 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH V2] " Bernd Kuhls
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559C5142.3090506@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox