From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/3] package/radlib: reworked autotools with pkg-config
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:39:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57067F3B.9060808@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460030625.3176.22.camel@intel.com>
On 04/07/16 14:03, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 00:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>> Do this in three separate patches: one that sets subdir-objects, one
>> that adds
>> pkg-config, and one that adds mysql-config.
>
> Ok then, use a hook for the rename.
>
> Might make more sense to do one patch for pkg-config with subdir
> -objects, because these are linked - which subdir objects you get
> depends on pkg-config?
Er, subdir-objects is just an option that is needed for recent autoconf when
you have directories without Makefile.am. Doesn't have anything to do with
pkg-config AFAIK.
>
> And then another patch for mysql-config. So two patches?
>
>>
>>> +-AC_ARG_ENABLE(mysql,
>>> +-[ --enable-mysql include radlib MySQL database
>>> support],
>>
>> Why would you remove this? An enable option is as good as a with
>> option.
>
> The original feedback I got was that the autotools implementation for
> radlib was hopelessly screwed up. I was trying to strike a balance
> between limiting changes but improving the overall flows.
From who did you get that feedback? Thomas wrote that the Makefile.am
contained some weird stuff, but that's a bit separate.
>
> I used with 'with' instead of 'enable' because of the semantics ...
>
> If a package _must_ be available on the platform for it available to
> choose then 'with' makes more sense than 'enable'. Radlib supports more
> than one back end so selecting a backend by indicating 'with' made more
> sense to me. 'enable' is typically for features whereas 'with', is
> typically used to indicate building 'with' a given package.
Well, your Config.in didn't express that at least one database must be
selected, and also your original replies to Thomas didn't say that, so I assumed
that the databases were indeed optional. But even if they are not optional, I
wouldn't bother changing the enable in a with.
>
> That said I am agnoistic, I am happy to revert to AC_ARG_ENABLE to
> reduce the patch.
>
[snip]
>>> +-AM_CONDITIONAL(MYSQL, test x$mysql = xtrue)
>>
>> Keep this, there is no reason to replace it by HAVE_MYSQL.
>
> Ok - I am pretty sure I got feedback to change these conditionals to
> HAVE_, but no problem I can fix.
I looked back at Thomas's original comments and couldn't find anything
suggesting that.
>
>
>>> + # define include directories
>>> +-INCLUDES = \
>>> ++AM_CFLAGS = \
>>
>> Why does this need to be changed?
>
> I will investigate ...
> The original INCLUDES was pulling in host directories.
> Not sure why the switch to AM_CFLAGS
>
>>
>>> + -I$(top_srcdir)/h \
>>> + -D_GNU_SOURCE
>>> +
>>
>> Did you forget to add $(SQLITE3_CFLAGS) etc?
>
> nope, no special include is needed for SQLITE.
Well, that's because in buildroot we install everything in /usr/include, so no
-I option is needed. But you can't assume that in general, so you will need
SQLITE3_CFLAGS for upstream.
>
>
>> Removing the CROSSCOMPILE part should be a separate patch.
>
> ok
Just to be clear: I mean a separate .patch file, not a separate commit in
buildroot.git.
Regards,
Arnout
[snip]
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-06 13:19 [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 0/3] package/radlib: new package ray.kinsella at intel.com
2016-04-06 13:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/3] package/radlib: kconfig and makefile ray.kinsella at intel.com
2016-04-06 22:20 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-07 11:04 ` Kinsella, Ray
2016-04-07 15:25 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-07 16:36 ` Kinsella, Ray
2016-04-10 14:59 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-11 8:45 ` Kinsella, Ray
2016-04-06 13:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/3] package/radlib: Renamed configure.in to configure.ac ray.kinsella at intel.com
2016-04-06 22:22 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-07 12:04 ` Kinsella, Ray
2016-04-06 13:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/3] package/radlib: reworked autotools with pkg-config ray.kinsella at intel.com
2016-04-06 22:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-04-07 12:03 ` Kinsella, Ray
2016-04-07 15:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57067F3B.9060808@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox