* [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45
@ 2026-08-14 19:00 Franciszek Stachura
2026-08-15 9:12 ` Julien Olivain via buildroot
2026-08-22 12:31 ` Titouan Christophe via buildroot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Franciszek Stachura @ 2026-08-14 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot; +Cc: Franciszek Stachura
https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1644
> Hot on the heels of the last security release is...
> another security release
https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1645
> So this is a lot of crash and security bugs.
Signed-off-by: Franciszek Stachura <fbstachura@gmail.com>
---
I'm wondering, are packages in Buildroot master supposed to be
bleeding-edge? The maintainer also left this in the release notes:
> If you decide to deploy this please be cautious; use a canary server
> and let it bake, just in case.
That said, 1.6.45 was released a month ago and I don't see any critical
bugs reported in Github issues. (there are two AI-generated reports, one
is not considered a security issue, the POC of the other does not work).
---
package/memcached/memcached.hash | 6 +++---
package/memcached/memcached.mk | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/memcached/memcached.hash b/package/memcached/memcached.hash
index 93480d338c..6a3de856e9 100644
--- a/package/memcached/memcached.hash
+++ b/package/memcached/memcached.hash
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-# From http://www.memcached.org/files/memcached-1.6.43.tar.gz.sha1
-sha1 37307d13528f355fb282bc8841ca033272e44ac9 memcached-1.6.43.tar.gz
+# From http://www.memcached.org/files/memcached-1.6.45.tar.gz.sha1
+sha1 45038980ea7045a548b9b5b5125ef7116312a768 memcached-1.6.45.tar.gz
# Locally computed
-sha256 8042ee26e004efa0db41ca4a7c713f759c3280c2f8bee438579f13de1e509435 memcached-1.6.43.tar.gz
+sha256 d362c64e6d8d5287153501eabf7c85b4a761432fbf53f5d7b085d0bb1653c1dd memcached-1.6.45.tar.gz
sha256 bc887c4ad8051fe690ace9528fe37a2e0bb362e6d963331d82e845ca9b585a0c COPYING
diff --git a/package/memcached/memcached.mk b/package/memcached/memcached.mk
index e297ca17ff..f86bd56006 100644
--- a/package/memcached/memcached.mk
+++ b/package/memcached/memcached.mk
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#
################################################################################
-MEMCACHED_VERSION = 1.6.43
+MEMCACHED_VERSION = 1.6.45
MEMCACHED_SITE = http://www.memcached.org/files
MEMCACHED_DEPENDENCIES = libevent
MEMCACHED_CONF_ENV = ac_cv_prog_cc_c99='-std=gnu99'
--
2.55.0
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45
2026-08-14 19:00 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45 Franciszek Stachura
@ 2026-08-15 9:12 ` Julien Olivain via buildroot
2026-08-22 12:31 ` Titouan Christophe via buildroot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julien Olivain via buildroot @ 2026-08-15 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Franciszek Stachura; +Cc: buildroot
Hi Franciszek,
On 14/08/2026 21:00, Franciszek Stachura wrote:
> https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1644
>> Hot on the heels of the last security release is...
>> another security release
>
> https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1645
>> So this is a lot of crash and security bugs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Franciszek Stachura <fbstachura@gmail.com>
Applied to master, thanks.
> ---
> I'm wondering, are packages in Buildroot master supposed to be
> bleeding-edge? The maintainer also left this in the release notes:
>
>> If you decide to deploy this please be cautious; use a canary server
>> and let it bake, just in case.
>
> That said, 1.6.45 was released a month ago and I don't see any critical
> bugs reported in Github issues. (there are two AI-generated reports,
> one
> is not considered a security issue, the POC of the other does not
> work).
I don't think there is a general rule to whether have or not packages
using bleeding-edge versions in Buildroot master branch. This depends
a bit on the upstream package itself, and it's also a up to the
Buildroot package maintainer.
The general rules I would give would be to try to keep package versions
that works in Buildroot (for all cpu architectures, gcc versions, with
dependencies too, ...), and avoid using intermediate development
version which are updated too often or too unstable.
Some packages, like Wine for example, decided to use
only stable versions:
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/blob/master/package/wine/wine.mk#L7
Best regards,
Julien.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45
2026-08-14 19:00 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45 Franciszek Stachura
2026-08-15 9:12 ` Julien Olivain via buildroot
@ 2026-08-22 12:31 ` Titouan Christophe via buildroot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Titouan Christophe via buildroot @ 2026-08-22 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Franciszek Stachura, buildroot
On 14/08/26 21:00, Franciszek Stachura wrote:
> https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1644
>> Hot on the heels of the last security release is...
>> another security release
> https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes1645
>> So this is a lot of crash and security bugs.
> Signed-off-by: Franciszek Stachura <fbstachura@gmail.com>
> ---
> I'm wondering, are packages in Buildroot master supposed to be
> bleeding-edge? The maintainer also left this in the release notes:
>
>> If you decide to deploy this please be cautious; use a canary server
>> and let it bake, just in case.
> That said, 1.6.45 was released a month ago and I don't see any critical
> bugs reported in Github issues. (there are two AI-generated reports, one
> is not considered a security issue, the POC of the other does not work).
Applied to 2025.02.x and 2026.05.x, thanks !
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-22 12:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-14 19:00 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/memcached: security bump version to 1.6.45 Franciszek Stachura
2026-08-15 9:12 ` Julien Olivain via buildroot
2026-08-22 12:31 ` Titouan Christophe via buildroot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox