From: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jezz@sysmic.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Add supporit for Vivante xdriver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:07:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6934033.ltB7kF42ss@sagittea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140916164655.5e2b10a9@free-electrons.com>
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 16:46:55 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear J?r?me Pouiller,
>
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:16:12 +0200, J?r?me Pouiller wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: J?r?me Pouiller <jezz@sysmic.org>
> > ---
> >
> > package/x11r7/Config.in | 1 +
> > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv/Config.in | 22 ++++++
> > ...mx-viv-001-Register-autotools-subprojects.patch | 31 +++++++++
> > ...driver_xf86-video-imx-viv-002-Fix-compile.patch | 80
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv.mk
> > | 17 +++++
> > 5 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv/Config.in
> > create mode 100644
> > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv-001-
> > Register-autotools-subprojects.patch create mode 100644
> > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv-002-
> > Fix-compile.patch create mode 100644
> > package/x11r7/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv/xdriver_xf86-video-imx-viv.mk
> I did a review of this patch on April, 20th, making several comments
> and asking for a new version of the patch. Are you still interested in
> getting this merged into Buildroot?
>
> I believe this would be a useful addition, but this patch has been sent
> 5 months ago, and never sent an updated version. Could you let us know
> what is the status of the patch, so that we can update our patch
> tracking system?
Initially, I sent this patch to answer to Marco's question (I should add in a
comment that it was not destined to upstream).
I know it would be a nice addition (I have also imx5 support in stock).
However, this package rely on specific versions of xorg, libdrm, kernel,
etc... So, it was always broken.
Freescale developments seems to be stabilized now. I may try to respin this
patch. In any case, new version will be completely different than this one.
--
J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic
Embedded Linux specialist
http://www.sysmic.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-30 13:47 [Buildroot] qt5, eglfs and xcb Marco Trapanese
2014-03-30 15:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-01 10:05 ` Marco Trapanese
2014-04-01 12:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-01 16:16 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2014-04-01 16:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qt5declarative: Reduce dependencies to GLes2 only Jérôme Pouiller
2014-04-20 9:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-15 8:26 ` Hadrien Boutteville
2014-07-15 14:03 ` Fatih Aşıcı
2014-07-15 16:24 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2014-07-15 17:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-01 16:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Add supporit for Vivante xdriver Jérôme Pouiller
2014-04-20 10:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-16 14:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-09-16 17:07 ` Jérôme Pouiller [this message]
2014-09-16 17:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-01 16:18 ` [Buildroot] qt5, eglfs and xcb Marco Trapanese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6934033.ltB7kF42ss@sagittea \
--to=jezz@sysmic.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox