From: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] linux-firmware: Allow selection of bnx2x fw version
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:51:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mcs9qkc.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPK8XeYeRYPdw1rjpYKW=XyQuw+X7fAn3Ds-RJC+zifJUjsjA@mail.gmail.com>
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> I think adding new config to chose between different versions of a
>> given firmware is going a bit too far. If we were to do that for all
>> firmwares in linux-firmware, it would really increase the number of
>> Config.in options too much.
>
> Yeah, I do agree with this concern. It's unfortunate we don't have a
> variable we can test to see what the kernel version is.
>
>> Shall I suggest to install both versions of the firmware? The firmware
>> files are not that large, and if filesystem size is really a strong
>> issue, it is always possible to clean up the non-required firmware
>> files in a post-build script.
>
> In our case the extra ~640kB would be worth cleaning up. I like
> buildroot for the clean tiny images it produces; I think that's worth
> preserving.
Also, at some point we run out of room on flash.
--
Stewart Smith
OPAL Architect, IBM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-29 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 4:31 [Buildroot] [PATCH] linux-firmware: Allow selection of bnx2x fw version Joel Stanley
2016-02-26 8:39 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-29 1:45 ` Joel Stanley
2016-02-29 2:51 ` Stewart Smith [this message]
2016-03-01 4:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] linux-firmware: Update bnx2x firwmare version Joel Stanley
2016-03-01 21:17 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-03-03 7:06 ` Joel Stanley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874mcs9qkc.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox