* [Buildroot] Support for ATMEL Sam9G45
@ 2009-12-09 11:03 Barry Bridges
2009-12-09 11:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Barry Bridges @ 2009-12-09 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi all,
New to the world of buildroot and this mailing list.
Just wondering if support for the ATMEL SAM9G45 was on the horizon or not.
I did read somewhere that a patch was added in June but no details.
Any ideas of a possible when?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20091209/b1e02009/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Support for ATMEL Sam9G45
2009-12-09 11:03 [Buildroot] Support for ATMEL Sam9G45 Barry Bridges
@ 2009-12-09 11:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2009-12-09 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Barry" == Barry Bridges <barry@disignconsultants.com> writes:
Barry> Hi all,
Barry> New to the world of buildroot and this mailing list.
Barry> Just wondering if support for the ATMEL SAM9G45 was on the
Barry> horizon or not.
There's no specific 9g45 support in BR, no. Ulf said he was working on
something, but I haven't heard from him for several months.
This is not such a big deal though, as the ARM core is supported and
there's (basic) 9g45 support in the mainline kernel.
I'll start working on a 9g45 platform early next year, and don't expect
any real problems.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-09 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-09 11:03 [Buildroot] Support for ATMEL Sam9G45 Barry Bridges
2009-12-09 11:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox