[Buildroot] continuous integration testing

[Buildroot] continuous integration testing

[J. Spence]

After troubleshooting a few more things with trunk, I'm beginning to think that I need to set up some kind of continuous integration platform so that any other mistakes in checkins trigger a notification.  

Does anyone have anything like this already, even in a broken state?  I'd rather repair a few squeaky wheels than build the whole cart myself.

This raises a few issues:

* CI notifications could be kind of annoying if they're all sent to the list.

* This will probably include cross-platform regressions as well, which could also be kind of annoying (imagine getting notifications about build problems on totally wacky configurations, like uclibc for itanium).

[Buildroot] continuous integration testing

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "J" == J Spence <j3mail-busybox@rearden.com> writes:

 J> After troubleshooting a few more things with trunk, I'm beginning
 J> to think that I need to set up some kind of continuous integration
 J> platform so that any other mistakes in checkins trigger a
 J> notification.  Does anyone have anything like this already, even
 J> in a broken state?  I'd rather repair a few squeaky wheels than
 J> build the whole cart myself.

Buildbot is quite nice (http://buildbot.net).

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] continuous integration testing

[John Voltz]

>
>
>
> Buildbot is quite nice (http://buildbot.net).
>

I better get outta here before you guys pull out the guns :oP

John Voltz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/buildroot/attachments/20080313/af75409e/attachment.htm