[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Mike Frysinger]

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
---
note: not really tested since external toolchain support is totally broken

 package/ncurses/ncurses.mk |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk b/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
index 0a49887..362f3ed 100644
--- a/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
+++ b/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 # USA
 
 # TARGETS
-NCURSES_VERSION = 5.7
+NCURSES_VERSION = 5.8
 NCURSES_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/ncurses
 NCURSES_SOURCE = ncurses-$(NCURSES_VERSION).tar.gz
 NCURSES_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
-- 
1.7.4.1

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

 Mike> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

Committed, thanks.

 Mike> note: not really tested since external toolchain support is
 Mike> totally broken

Ohh?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

 Mike> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
 Mike> ---
 Mike> note: not really tested since external toolchain support is totally broken

Have you had a chance to test it now? It seems to be crashing on all the
configs I've tried (arm9 / x86, gcc 4.3.x / 4.5.x, uClibc 0.9.31 /
0.9.32-rc3).

The problem is a null pointer access in tgetent. It seems to load the
terminfo file ok, but something goes wrong.

Reverting back to 5.7 everything works fine aagain.

 Mike>  package/ncurses/ncurses.mk |    2 +-
 Mike>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

 Mike> diff --git a/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk b/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
 Mike> index 0a49887..362f3ed 100644
 Mike> --- a/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
 Mike> +++ b/package/ncurses/ncurses.mk
 Mike> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 Mike>  # USA
 
 Mike>  # TARGETS
 Mike> -NCURSES_VERSION = 5.7
 Mike> +NCURSES_VERSION = 5.8
 Mike>  NCURSES_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/ncurses
 Mike>  NCURSES_SOURCE = ncurses-$(NCURSES_VERSION).tar.gz
 Mike>  NCURSES_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 Mike> -- 
 Mike> 1.7.4.1

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Mike Frysinger]

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> ?Mike> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> ?Mike> ---
> ?Mike> note: not really tested since external toolchain support is totally broken
>
> Have you had a chance to test it now?

ive tested external toolchain support and it works fine for me now
after merging Sonic's patch

as for ncurses-5.8 itself, i deployed it in Gentoo about a month ago
and no one has filed a bug about it ...
-mike

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

Hi,

 >> Have you had a chance to test it now?

 Mike> ive tested external toolchain support and it works fine for me now
 Mike> after merging Sonic's patch

Ok.

 Mike> as for ncurses-5.8 itself, i deployed it in Gentoo about a month ago
 Mike> and no one has filed a bug about it ...

Ok, odd. I do see several gentoo bugs related to ncurses 5.8 though
(rtorrent, vifm).

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Mike Frysinger]

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> ?Mike> as for ncurses-5.8 itself, i deployed it in Gentoo about a month ago
> ?Mike> and no one has filed a bug about it ...
>
> Ok, odd. I do see several gentoo bugs related to ncurses 5.8 though
> (rtorrent, vifm).

seems like all the logged gentoo bugs are issues in the packages and not ncurses

did you have a particular app you were running from BR that exhibited
the issue ?
-mike

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

Hi,

 >> Ok, odd. I do see several gentoo bugs related to ncurses 5.8 though
 >> (rtorrent, vifm).

 Mike> seems like all the logged gentoo bugs are issues in the packages
 Mike> and not ncurses

Somewhat true. Looking at the Debian bugs I see ncurses 5.8 fails on
newwin(0, 0, 0, 0) which it shouldn't - That's fixed post 5.8 though.

 Mike> did you have a particular app you were running from BR that
 Mike> exhibited the issue ?

Well, everything I tried:

- python with it's readline module
- less
- dialog

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Sergio Monteiro Basto]

On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:31 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> The problem is a null pointer access in tgetent. It seems to load the
> terminfo file ok, but something goes wrong.

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2845

we shoun't build curses with --with-termlib=tinfo 

I have made a draft of a patch 
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2845#c8

-- 
S?rgio M. B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20110404/2cf4f18c/attachment.bin>

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org> writes:

 Sergio> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:31 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
 >> The problem is a null pointer access in tgetent. It seems to load the
 >> terminfo file ok, but something goes wrong.

 Sergio> https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2845

 Sergio> we shoun't build curses with --with-termlib=tinfo 

Does that have anything to do with the crash? Your bug report (which I
cannot reproduce) seems to be related to a build error rather than a
runtime one.

I've now just tested with a glibc toolchain (E.G
qemu_arm_versatile_defconfig and select external codesourcery 2010.09
toolchain) and stuff using ncurses (I tried htop) also crashes here, so
it doesn't seem to be something specific to uclibc.

I've also tested ncurses 5.9 with the same results. with 2011.05 getting
quite near, perhaps the best approach is to revert to ncurses 5.7?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Sergio Monteiro Basto]

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: 
> >>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org> writes:
> 
>  Sergio> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:31 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>  >> The problem is a null pointer access in tgetent. It seems to load the
>  >> terminfo file ok, but something goes wrong.
> 
>  Sergio> https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2845
> 
>  Sergio> we shoun't build curses with --with-termlib=tinfo 
> 
> Does that have anything to do with the crash? Your bug report (which I
> cannot reproduce) seems to be related to a build error rather than a
> runtime one.

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2845#c7

After you fix the build error, I wrote that we should built ncurses with
configure option  --with-termlib=tinfo , which Fedora use by default .
And you wrote to make a "patch adding optional tinfo build" , I done one
draft of the patch.

Since this bug in runtime, seems to be with terminfo, build with option
--with-termlib=tinfo , doesn't solve the problem ? 

> I've now just tested with a glibc toolchain (E.G
> qemu_arm_versatile_defconfig and select external codesourcery 2010.09
> toolchain) and stuff using ncurses (I tried htop) also crashes here, so
> it doesn't seem to be something specific to uclibc.
> 
> I've also tested ncurses 5.9 with the same results. with 2011.05 getting
> quite near, perhaps the best approach is to revert to ncurses 5.7?
> 

-- 
S?rgio M. B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20110420/301f26a2/attachment.bin>

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org> writes:

Hi,

 Sergio> After you fix the build error, I wrote that we should built
 Sergio> ncurses with configure option --with-termlib=tinfo , which
 Sergio> Fedora use by default .  And you wrote to make a "patch adding
 Sergio> optional tinfo build" , I done one draft of the patch.

 Sergio> Since this bug in runtime, seems to be with terminfo, build with option
 Sergio> --with-termlib=tinfo , doesn't solve the problem ? 

I haven't tried, but doesn't that just shuffle part of the ncurses
functions into libtinfo? I don't right away see why that would fix
anything, but I'll start a build now.

Besides this hypothetical fix, is there any other reason why
--with-termlib=tinfo would be preferable?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Sergio Monteiro Basto]

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 20:05 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: 
> >>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Sergio> After you fix the build error, I wrote that we should built
>  Sergio> ncurses with configure option --with-termlib=tinfo , which
>  Sergio> Fedora use by default .  And you wrote to make a "patch adding
>  Sergio> optional tinfo build" , I done one draft of the patch.
> 
>  Sergio> Since this bug in runtime, seems to be with terminfo, build with option
>  Sergio> --with-termlib=tinfo , doesn't solve the problem ? 
> 
> I haven't tried, but doesn't that just shuffle part of the ncurses
> functions into libtinfo? I don't right away see why that would fix
> anything, but I'll start a build now.

so, it fix anything ? 

> Besides this hypothetical fix, is there any other reason why
> --with-termlib=tinfo would be preferable?

Well, What I know is. 
Is a default of Fedora and seems to me that ncurses becomes better.
In fact builds libtinfo.so which will be use (when exist) in some others
packages, one of them is dialog. 
I can't say nothing more for sure , but packages use libtinfo.so if they
exist by default, so probably will work better if lib exist. 

Best regards,
-- 
S?rgio M. B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20110421/16a29976/attachment.bin>

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org> writes:

Hi,

 >> I haven't tried, but doesn't that just shuffle part of the ncurses
 >> functions into libtinfo? I don't right away see why that would fix
 >> anything, but I'll start a build now.

 Sergio> so, it fix anything ? 

No, as expected the behaviour is exactly the same.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> Sergio Monteiro Basto writes:
>>> I haven't tried, but doesn't that just shuffle part of the ncurses
>>> functions into libtinfo? I don't right away see why that would fix
>>> anything, but I'll start a build now.
>>
>> so, it fix anything ?
>
> No, as expected the behaviour is exactly the same.

ncurses 5.9 is out and seems to be mostly a bugfix release over 5.8
... probably worth testing
-mike

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Sergio Monteiro Basto]

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 18:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >> Sergio Monteiro Basto writes:
> >>> I haven't tried, but doesn't that just shuffle part of the ncurses
> >>> functions into libtinfo? I don't right away see why that would fix
> >>> anything, but I'll start a build now.
> >>
> >> so, it fix anything ?
> >
> > No, as expected the behaviour is exactly the same.
> 
> ncurses 5.9 is out and seems to be mostly a bugfix release over 5.8
> ... probably worth testing

In this thread Peter was wrote:  

"I've also tested ncurses 5.9 with the same results. with 2011.05
getting
quite near, perhaps the best approach is to revert to ncurses 5.7? "

Best regards,
-- 
S?rgio M. B.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20110422/d91bb433/attachment.bin>

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Mike Frysinger]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> "I've also tested ncurses 5.9 with the same results. with 2011.05
> getting quite near, perhaps the best approach is to revert to ncurses 5.7?"

probably reverting to 5.7 for the release makes sense
-mike

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

Hi,

 Mike> ncurses 5.9 is out and seems to be mostly a bugfix release over 5.8
 Mike> ... probably worth testing

As I mentioned in my previous mail, I already tried 5.9 and got same
crash as on 5.8 (arm926, both on glibc and uclibc).

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Heiko Zuerker]

Quoting Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>:

>>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>  Mike> ncurses 5.9 is out and seems to be mostly a bugfix release over 5.8
>  Mike> ... probably worth testing
>
> As I mentioned in my previous mail, I already tried 5.9 and got same
> crash as on 5.8 (arm926, both on glibc and uclibc).

The problem has something to do with readline.
I tested it against bash and as soon as readline support is off, the  
seg fault disappears.

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Heiko" == Heiko Zuerker <heiko@zuerker.org> writes:

 >> As I mentioned in my previous mail, I already tried 5.9 and got same
 >> crash as on 5.8 (arm926, both on glibc and uclibc).

 Heiko> The problem has something to do with readline.
 Heiko> I tested it against bash and as soon as readline support is off, the
 Heiko> seg fault disappears.

But if you build without readline support, then bash isn't linked
against ncurses at all, is it?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] ncurses: version bump to 5.8

[Heiko Zuerker]

Quoting Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>:

>>>>>> "Heiko" == Heiko Zuerker <heiko@zuerker.org> writes:
>
>  >> As I mentioned in my previous mail, I already tried 5.9 and got same
>  >> crash as on 5.8 (arm926, both on glibc and uclibc).
>
>  Heiko> The problem has something to do with readline.
>  Heiko> I tested it against bash and as soon as readline support is off, the
>  Heiko> seg fault disappears.
>
> But if you build without readline support, then bash isn't linked
> against ncurses at all, is it?

I did a quick test compile and you're right.
I'll take back what I said and blame ncurses again. ;-)

-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.