[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[ulf at uclibc.org]

Author: ulf
Date: 2009-01-22 07:39:12 +0000 (Thu, 22 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24950

Log:
Fix AVR32 u.boot build bug

Added:
   trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32


Changeset:
Added: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32
===================================================================
--- trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32	                        (rev 0)
+++ trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32	2009-01-22 07:39:12 UTC (rev 24950)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+diff -urN u-boot-2009.01-rc3/include/asm-avr32/io.h u-boot-avr32//include/asm-avr32/io.h
+--- u-boot-2009.01-rc3/include/asm-avr32/io.h	2009-01-18 21:37:48.000000000 +0100
++++ u-boot-avr32//include/asm-avr32/io.h	2009-01-22 07:14:38.000000000 +0100
+@@ -125,9 +125,4 @@
+ 
+ }
+ 
+-static inline phys_addr_t virt_to_phys(void * vaddr)
+-{
+-	return (phys_addr_t)(vaddr);
+-}
+-
+ #endif /* __ASM_AVR32_IO_H */

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "ulf" == ulf  <ulf@uclibc.org> writes:

 ulf> Author: ulf
 ulf> Date: 2009-01-22 07:39:12 +0000 (Thu, 22 Jan 2009)
 ulf> New Revision: 24950

 ulf> Log:
 ulf> Fix AVR32 u.boot build bug

 ulf> Added:
 ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32

I don't see this either in U-Boot git or as a patch to the mailing
list.

2009.01 is furthermore released, so -rcX should imho go.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[Ulf Samuelsson]

tor 2009-01-22 klockan 10:11 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "ulf" == ulf  <ulf@uclibc.org> writes:
> 
>  ulf> Author: ulf
>  ulf> Date: 2009-01-22 07:39:12 +0000 (Thu, 22 Jan 2009)
>  ulf> New Revision: 24950
> 
>  ulf> Log:
>  ulf> Fix AVR32 u.boot build bug
> 
>  ulf> Added:
>  ulf>    trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3/u-boot-2009.01-rc3-include_asm-avr32_io.h.patch.avr32
> 
> I don't see this either in U-Boot git or as a patch to the mailing
> list.
> 

It is in the u-boot-avr32 git.
I pointed it out to Haavard, so he has asked Wolfgang
to pull this patch, but it is too late for 2009.01


> 2009.01 is furthermore released, so -rcX should imho go.
> 

I am testing this very thing right now, so
2009.01-rc3 will go, and 2009.01
will be enabled, and the patch will be moved 
to the correct directory.

BR
Ulf Samuelsson

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> writes:

 >> I don't see this either in U-Boot git or as a patch to the mailing
 >> list.

 Ulf> It is in the u-boot-avr32 git.
 Ulf> I pointed it out to Haavard, so he has asked Wolfgang
 Ulf> to pull this patch, but it is too late for 2009.01

So 2009.01 is broken on all avr32? Seems like someone forgot to do
tests.

I see that your patch is not the same as Haavard sent to wdenx,
perhaps update?

 >> 2009.01 is furthermore released, so -rcX should imho go.
 >> 

 Ulf> I am testing this very thing right now, so
 Ulf> 2009.01-rc3 will go, and 2009.01
 Ulf> will be enabled, and the patch will be moved 
 Ulf> to the correct directory.

I already did that yesterday.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/target/u-boot/2009.01-rc3

[Ulf Samuelsson]

fre 2009-01-23 klockan 10:16 +0100 skrev Peter Korsgaard:
> >>>>> "Ulf" == Ulf Samuelsson <ulf.samuelsson@atmel.com> writes:
> 
>  >> I don't see this either in U-Boot git or as a patch to the mailing
>  >> list.
> 
>  Ulf> It is in the u-boot-avr32 git.
>  Ulf> I pointed it out to Haavard, so he has asked Wolfgang
>  Ulf> to pull this patch, but it is too late for 2009.01
> 
> So 2009.01 is broken on all avr32? Seems like someone forgot to do
> tests.

Yes, Got the fix from the u-boot AVR32 git but that
never got pulled in time.


> I see that your patch is not the same as Haavard sent to wdenx,
> perhaps update?
> 

It is probably doing the same thing, but I'll check

>  >> 2009.01 is furthermore released, so -rcX should imho go.
>  >> 
> 
>  Ulf> I am testing this very thing right now, so
>  Ulf> 2009.01-rc3 will go, and 2009.01
>  Ulf> will be enabled, and the patch will be moved 
>  Ulf> to the correct directory.
> 
> I already did that yesterday.
> 

Saw that after sending the mail.
/Ulf