Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] ruby: bump to version 2.1.2
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:56:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppfjrapa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140829091725.1fd32d4d@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:17:25 +0200")

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:

Hi,

 >> I don't really know much about Ruby. Is 2.1.x compatible with 1.9.x or
 >> is it like Python2/Python3?

 > I don't really know much about Ruby either. But, about Ruby 2.0,
 > Wikipedia says:

 > ""
 > Ruby 2.0 is intended to be fully backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3.
 > As of the official 2.0.0 release on February 24, 2013, there were only
 > five known (minor) incompatibilities.
 > ""

 > And then, about Ruby 2.1, they say:

 > ""
 > Ruby 2.1.0 was released on Christmas Day in 2013.[31] The release
 > includes speed-ups, bugfixes, and library updates. Starting with 2.1.0,
 > Ruby is using semantic versioning.
 > ""

 > So I believe we can simply bump the ruby package to 2.1, and not bother
 > keeping two separate packages.

Ok, thanks - Committed to next.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-29  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-28 22:17 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] Misc Ruby updates Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-28 22:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] ruby: requires shared library Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-29  7:16   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-08-28 22:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] ruby: should not use dl_iterate_phdr() on Blackfin Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-29  7:16   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-08-28 22:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] ruby: bump to version 2.1.2 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-29  7:15   ` Peter Korsgaard
2014-08-29  7:17     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-08-29  7:56       ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ppfjrapa.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox