From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] vala: add vala/valac wrapper
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:19:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wppv78tt.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223104816.20c97306@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:48:16 +0100")
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes:
> Hello,
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:42:24 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>> This could indeed be a good idea. One reason to limit the number of committers
>> was to avoid conflicts (i.e. two committers working on the same patch in
>> parallel), but as I understand it, Thomas and Peter noticed that this isn't
>> really a problem in practice.
>>
>> So indeed, having a third person that applies trivial patches could be
>> worthwhile to try.
>>
>> That said, Yann and I are already spending a large part of our buildroot time
>> on reviewing patches. I don't think that applying them immediately is going to
>> make that much of a difference.
> Fully agreed: applying the patch is clearly not what takes time. It's a
> mechanical and stupid operation.
Agreed. I'm all for ways of improving our ways of working, but I don't
think this will change much. Adding Thomas as a co-maintainer has imho
been very good, but adding a 3rd committer without having more reviewers
imho won't make any significant difference.
--
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 16:01 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] vala: add vala/valac wrapper Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-02 16:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] libgee: new package Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-02 16:01 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] granite: " Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-21 21:28 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] vala: add vala/valac wrapper Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-22 1:22 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-22 23:47 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-23 0:18 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-23 0:40 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-23 1:06 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-23 9:42 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-23 9:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-23 15:19 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2016-02-23 19:43 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-23 20:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-23 9:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-02-22 23:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-02-23 0:27 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-02-23 0:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wppv78tt.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox