From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Report from the Buildroot Meeting in Berlin
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:39:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziltly45.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4fb3016-266b-d9bf-bbe1-ec7169c7136a@imgtec.com> (Vicente Olivert Riera's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:19:30 +0100")
>>>>> "Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> writes:
>> If that is the only problem, couldn't we just add -mno-msa to the
>> kernel/bootloader if _MIPS_MSA is enabled?
> That would be a solution, filter (or append -mno-* counterparts) to the
> flags when building kernel or bootloaders. The thing is we would need to
> do this for other optimization options (not just MSA) and architectures.
> Do we want to do that? It looks better and cleaner to have a variable
> that holds flags suitable for building packages but not for building
> kernels/bootloaders. I think that's what Arnout means with the
> TARGET_EXTRA_CFLAGS.
Do we expect to have a lot of such new flags in the future? We already
do something similar for some of the arm specific flags (E.G. force
-marm for stuff that cannot be built in thumb2 mode).
I agree that it isn't very pretty, but again it is a tradeoff between
how complicated we want to make the toolchain wrapper.
--
Venlig hilsen,
Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 20:10 [Buildroot] Report from the Buildroot Meeting in Berlin Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-20 16:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-21 8:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-21 8:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-21 9:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-24 12:02 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-10-24 12:19 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2016-10-24 12:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-24 13:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-24 14:52 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2016-10-24 14:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-24 15:47 ` [Buildroot] Toolchain wrapper CFLAGS [was: Re: Report from the Buildroot Meeting in Berlin] Arnout Vandecappelle
2016-10-24 12:39 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2016-10-24 0:54 ` [Buildroot] Report from the Buildroot Meeting in Berlin Sam Bobroff
2016-10-24 7:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-10-25 2:21 ` Sam Bobroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ziltly45.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox