[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] New: lsblk does not compile for util-linux

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] New: lsblk does not compile for util-linux

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

            Bug ID: 10281
           Summary: lsblk does not compile for util-linux
           Product: buildroot
           Version: 2017.05.1
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Other
          Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
          Reporter: adyke at harris.com
                CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
  Target Milestone: ---

lsblk is not compiled with util-linux

Commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 indicates the
BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK option was removed when upgrading to util-linux
2.28.2 since that version always built lsblk. 
However, in when using buildroot 2017.05.2 (which uses util-linux 2.29.2) lsblk
is not built.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at buildroot.uclibc |casantos at datacom.ind.br
                   |.org                        |

--- Comment #1 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> ---
The "lsblk" utility is part of the "basic set", now. Ensure that you have
BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES selected.

If this does not work then please run "make BR2_DEFCONFIG=/tmp/my-defconfig
savedefconfig" and attach the resulting /tmp/my-defconfig to this bug report,
so I can try to reproduce the problem here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

--- Comment #2 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> ---
I just noticed that commit 031659024b3cf27bb68dc58d07519b563ef472a1 did not add
the required entries in Config.in.legacy for BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_FINDFS and
BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_LSBLK selecting BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Buildroot] [Bug 10281] lsblk does not compile for util-linux

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=10281

Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br> ---
No answer from the submitter in more than 30 days. Closing as invalid, since
lsblk is enabled by the "basic set" option, as already explained.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.