* [Buildroot] [Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10
@ 2009-02-18 0:34 bugzilla at busybox.net
2009-02-18 7:38 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 111] " bugzilla at busybox.net
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-02-18 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111
Host: openSESE 11.1
Target: mipsel
Build: 2009.02-rc4
Summary: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Outdated package
AssignedTo: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
ReportedBy: luke_tucker at yahoo.co.uk
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
The configure script of binutils 2.17 tries to detect whether makeinfo is later
than v4.4 however it does not take into account minor versions with double
digits so v4.12 fails the test and stops binutils building even though the
texinfo verion is valid.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] [Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 2009-02-18 0:34 [Buildroot] [Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-02-18 7:38 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-03 21:24 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-07 13:11 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-02-18 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jacmet at uclibc.org --- Comment #1 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> 2009-02-18 07:38:16 UTC --- Ok, thanks for reporting. Why would you want to use binutils 2.17 instead of 2.19? Do you have the same issue with 2.19? As you probably noticed, 2.17 is marked as deprecated and is scheduled to go away in the next release (2009.05). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 2009-02-18 0:34 [Buildroot] [Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-02-18 7:38 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 111] " bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-03-03 21:24 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-07 13:11 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-03-03 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> 2009-03-03 21:24:19 UTC --- Fixed in r25512. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] [Bug 111] binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 2009-02-18 0:34 [Buildroot] [Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-02-18 7:38 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 111] " bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-03 21:24 ` bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-03-07 13:11 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: bugzilla at busybox.net @ 2009-03-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: buildroot https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=111 --- Comment #3 from Luke <luke_tucker@yahoo.co.uk> 2009-03-07 13:11:03 UTC --- The reason I was using binutils 2.17 is because I'm building applications for a reverse engineered platform (TViX DVICO 6500) and I am trying to keep everything as close to the toolchain used by the original developers even though 2.19 will probably work as you say. Thanks for the fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.busybox.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-07 13:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-02-18 0:34 [Buildroot] [Bug 111] New: binutils 2.17 fails to build when texinfo >= 4.10 bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-02-18 7:38 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 111] " bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-03 21:24 ` bugzilla at busybox.net 2009-03-07 13:11 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox