[Buildroot] [Bug 9846] New: musl libc not installed correctly in target folder

[Buildroot] [Bug 9846] New: musl libc not installed correctly in target folder

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9846

            Bug ID: 9846
           Summary: musl libc not installed correctly in target folder
           Product: buildroot
           Version: 2017.02.1
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Other
          Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
          Reporter: stefan at nilsson.tk
                CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 7051
  --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=7051&action=edit
defconfigs for glibc/musl respectively

I am the deveveloper of a custom i386 based embedded Linux system, and I am
using buildroot to create the system images that goes into it.

I am currently running on the master branch of buildroot as of yesterday
2016-04-26 (6538125 package/pcsc-lite: bump version to 1.8.20) since I wanted
to try out the newly added s6 stuff:

However, I usually build my linux system using glibc and the busybox init
system. Yesterday I wanted to try out the musl libc to see how it performed
compared to glibc. But when changing to musl libc and after a "make clean"
"make", which goes through without issues, it appears as musl libc is not
installed correctly in the target folder.

When building with glibc as option, I get the following files in my
output/target/lib (among a bunch of others):

/lib/libc.so -> libc.so.6*
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.24.so*
/lib/libc-2.24.so*
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.24.so*
/lib/ld-2.24.so*

When building with musl, I only get:

/lib/ld-musl-i386.so.1 -> /lib/libc.so
/lib/libc.so -> libc.so.6

So there is a symlink to libc.so.6, but file it points to does not exist which
makes my init fail to execute during boot.

When looking in my output/build/musl-1.1.16/lib, I guess I have the missing
files:

libc.a
libc.so*

But these seems to never be copied to the target folder correctly,...

If I manually copy the contents of output/build/musl-1.1.16/lib/ to /lib on my
target system (and remove the libc.so symlink), my init works as expected, and
I can boot it completely.

I have attached my buildroot defconfig for both configurations.

Best Regards
Stefan Nilsson

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Buildroot] [Bug 9846] musl libc not installed correctly in target folder

[bugzilla at busybox.net]

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=9846

Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> ---
Thanks for your report. Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce. The musl
system produced by your defconfig looks OK to me:

$ ls -l target/lib/libc.so 
-rwxr-xr-x 1 test test 587296 May  7 15:29 target/lib/libc.so

And it boots just fine (tested under Qemu):

Welcome to TEST
test login: 
Welcome to TEST
test login: 

So, a few options:

 1. Something has been fixed since then, but I don't recall any fix related to
this being applied recently.

 2. Something is different on your build machine.

 3. You did not clean up the build completely.

I'll mark the bug as WORKSFORME for now. If you manage to reproduce again with
the latest Buildroot, could you try to preview a simpler defconfig that
exhibits the issue so that we can try to narrow down the issue ?

Keeping the full build log would also be useful.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.