* [Buildroot] Documentation question
@ 2009-12-09 20:39 Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 21:11 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 22:32 ` Michael S. Zick
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Edwards @ 2009-12-09 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
I've been reading the "buildroot usage and documentation"
document over the past couple days, and in order to not be a
complete leech, I'm fixing various minor problems (typos,
spelling, punctuation, usage, grammar, etc.) and will submmit a
patch when I've finished.
However, I've run across one paragraph where I think the actual
content could use a tweak, and I thought I should ask about it
before making a change. In the section "Using Buildroot"
there's a paragraph that describes what the top-level "make"
does:
$ make
This command will download, configure and compile all the
selected tools, and finally generate a toolchain, a root
filesystem image and a kernel image (or only one of these
elements, depending on the configuration).
Doesn't the toolchain have to be generated _before_ the
selected tools are configured and compiled?
IOW, "generate a toolchain" seems to me to be in the wrong
place in the sequence. Right?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I just forgot my whole
at philosophy of life!!!
visi.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] Documentation question
2009-12-09 20:39 [Buildroot] Documentation question Grant Edwards
@ 2009-12-09 21:11 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 22:32 ` Michael S. Zick
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Edwards @ 2009-12-09 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 2009-12-09, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been reading the "buildroot usage and documentation"
> document over the past couple days, and in order to not be a
> complete leech, I'm fixing various minor problems (typos,
> spelling, punctuation, usage, grammar, etc.) and will submmit a
> patch when I've finished.
>
> However, I've run across one paragraph where I think the actual
> content could use a tweak, and I thought I should ask about it
> before making a change.
Another question on content -- the doc says
Buildroot optionally honors some environment variables that
are passed to make:
HOSTCXX, the host C++ compiler to use
HOSTCC, the host C compiler to use
UCLIBC_CONFIG_FILE [...]
From what I've been able to figure out, honoring those is not
an option. Aren't they're always honored? If honoring those
is optional, how/where is that option configured?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! An Italian is COMBING
at his hair in suburban DES
visi.com MOINES!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Buildroot] Documentation question
2009-12-09 20:39 [Buildroot] Documentation question Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 21:11 ` Grant Edwards
@ 2009-12-09 22:32 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-12-09 22:54 ` Grant Edwards
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Zick @ 2009-12-09 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Wed December 9 2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I've been reading the "buildroot usage and documentation"
> document over the past couple days, and in order to not be a
> complete leech, I'm fixing various minor problems (typos,
> spelling, punctuation, usage, grammar, etc.) and will submmit a
> patch when I've finished.
>
> However, I've run across one paragraph where I think the actual
> content could use a tweak, and I thought I should ask about it
> before making a change. In the section "Using Buildroot"
> there's a paragraph that describes what the top-level "make"
> does:
>
> $ make
>
> This command will download, configure and compile all the
> selected tools, and finally generate a toolchain, a root
> filesystem image and a kernel image (or only one of these
> elements, depending on the configuration).
>
> Doesn't the toolchain have to be generated _before_ the
> selected tools are configured and compiled?
>
Just needs some clarification.
"Generate toolchain" in the sentence seems to mean a native
toolchain (which Buildroot can do - similar to any other package).
What you are referring too seems to be an cross-compile toolchain.
Which does not seem to be mentioned (or maybe the native toolchain isn't mentioned).
*) Downloads (either as required, or pre-downloads all (make source))
*) Configures cross-compile toolchain
*) Builds cross-compile toolchain
*) Builds selected packages (optional)
*) Builds a native toolchain (optional, like any other "package")
*) Builds a kernel image (optional)
*) Creates a root filesystem in selectable forms (filesystem, archive, ...)
Or something close to that - notice two (2) "toolchains"
Mike
> IOW, "generate a toolchain" seems to me to be in the wrong
> place in the sequence. Right?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Documentation question
2009-12-09 22:32 ` Michael S. Zick
@ 2009-12-09 22:54 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 23:07 ` Michael S. Zick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Edwards @ 2009-12-09 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On 2009-12-09, Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
> On Wed December 9 2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> I've been reading the "buildroot usage and documentation"
>> document over the past couple days, and in order to not be a
>> complete leech, I'm fixing various minor problems (typos,
>> spelling, punctuation, usage, grammar, etc.) and will submmit
>> a patch when I've finished.
>>
>> However, I've run across one paragraph where I think the
>> actual content could use a tweak, and I thought I should ask
>> about it before making a change. In the section "Using
>> Buildroot" there's a paragraph that describes what the
>> top-level "make" does:
>>
>> $ make
>>
>> This command will download, configure and compile all the
>> selected tools, and finally generate a toolchain, a root
>> filesystem image and a kernel image (or only one of these
>> elements, depending on the configuration).
>>
>> Doesn't the toolchain have to be generated _before_ the
>> selected tools are configured and compiled?
>
> Just needs some clarification.
>
> "Generate toolchain" in the sentence seems to mean a native
> toolchain
Ah, it hadn't occurred to me that what was meant was the native
toolchain.
> (which Buildroot can do - similar to any other package).
Of course.
> What you are referring too seems to be an cross-compile
> toolchain.
Indeed. I was assuming that the toolchain mentioned was the
cross toolchain since the target-native toolchain is treated
like any other target package.
> Which does not seem to be mentioned (or maybe the native
> toolchain isn't mentioned).
>
> *) Downloads (either as required, or pre-downloads all (make source))
> *) Configures cross-compile toolchain
> *) Builds cross-compile toolchain
> *) Builds selected packages (optional)
> *) Builds a native toolchain (optional, like any other "package")
> *) Builds a kernel image (optional)
> *) Creates a root filesystem in selectable forms (filesystem, archive, ...)
>
> Or something close to that - notice two (2) "toolchains"
Right. I'll re-write that paragraph to use that list of steps.
Just for the sake of curiosity, how often do people generate a
target-native toolchain with buildroot? [I don't think any of
the platforms I work with would have the resources available to
use one.]
--
Grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Documentation question
2009-12-09 22:54 ` Grant Edwards
@ 2009-12-09 23:07 ` Michael S. Zick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Zick @ 2009-12-09 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Wed December 9 2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-12-09, Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org> wrote:
> > On Wed December 9 2009, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> >> I've been reading the "buildroot usage and documentation"
> >> document over the past couple days, and in order to not be a
> >> complete leech, I'm fixing various minor problems (typos,
> >> spelling, punctuation, usage, grammar, etc.) and will submmit
> >> a patch when I've finished.
> >>
> >> However, I've run across one paragraph where I think the
> >> actual content could use a tweak, and I thought I should ask
> >> about it before making a change. In the section "Using
> >> Buildroot" there's a paragraph that describes what the
> >> top-level "make" does:
> >>
> >> $ make
> >>
> >> This command will download, configure and compile all the
> >> selected tools, and finally generate a toolchain, a root
> >> filesystem image and a kernel image (or only one of these
> >> elements, depending on the configuration).
> >>
> >> Doesn't the toolchain have to be generated _before_ the
> >> selected tools are configured and compiled?
> >
> > Just needs some clarification.
> >
> > "Generate toolchain" in the sentence seems to mean a native
> > toolchain
>
> Ah, it hadn't occurred to me that what was meant was the native
> toolchain.
>
> > (which Buildroot can do - similar to any other package).
>
> Of course.
>
> > What you are referring too seems to be an cross-compile
> > toolchain.
>
> Indeed. I was assuming that the toolchain mentioned was the
> cross toolchain since the target-native toolchain is treated
> like any other target package.
>
> > Which does not seem to be mentioned (or maybe the native
> > toolchain isn't mentioned).
> >
> > *) Downloads (either as required, or pre-downloads all (make source))
> > *) Configures cross-compile toolchain
> > *) Builds cross-compile toolchain
> > *) Builds selected packages (optional)
> > *) Builds a native toolchain (optional, like any other "package")
> > *) Builds a kernel image (optional)
> > *) Creates a root filesystem in selectable forms (filesystem, archive, ...)
> >
> > Or something close to that - notice two (2) "toolchains"
>
> Right. I'll re-write that paragraph to use that list of steps.
>
> Just for the sake of curiosity, how often do people generate a
> target-native toolchain with buildroot? [I don't think any of
> the platforms I work with would have the resources available to
> use one.]
>
I tried just prior to 2009.11 - it seemed broke then for MIPS but
that was very early in my using Buildroot.
The system(s) I am building are after-market systems for Media
Players . . .
Which often have Tetrabytes of user-attached storage.
The processors are usually 400-650Mhz MIPS cores with at least
128Mbyte of ram, turn on swap...
Yeah, they can "self host".
Over here: http://MiniModding.com
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-09 23:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-09 20:39 [Buildroot] Documentation question Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 21:11 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 22:32 ` Michael S. Zick
2009-12-09 22:54 ` Grant Edwards
2009-12-09 23:07 ` Michael S. Zick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox