From: <bogus@does.not.exist.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: No subject
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:04:13 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1.1187102296.1107.buildroot@uclibc.org> (raw)
>
> I Think we should modify this so that the Makefile
> checks for the existance of the source file in $(DL_DIR)
> like most other packages.
> Tried, (see patch below), but the rule:
>
> +$(DL_DIR)/$$($(PKG)_SOURCE):
> $(call MESSAGE,"Downloading")
> test -e $(DL_DIR)/$($(PKG)_SOURCE) || $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR)
> $($(PKG)_SITE)/$($(PKG)_SOURCE)
> mkdir -p $(@D)
Mainly because of the way, make handles variables. They get
expanded,when the makefile is parsed. Even the doubled dollarsign can't
help you here.
>
> fails (is not found) so I had to add
>
> +$$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE):
> + $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR) $$($(2)_SITE)/$$($(2)_SOURCE)
> +
>
In the macro it gets evaluated every time any package wants it to use.
Does that really pays the one unneeded stamp-file?
> to make it work.
> Anyone got a clue why the first rule fails?
>
>
> Maybe we should also consider building x11r7 in $(BUILD_DIR)/x11r7
> due to crowding.
You even get afraid of crowding, aren't you?
>
>
> Index: package/Makefile.autotools.in
> ===================================================================
> --- package/Makefile.autotools.in (revision 19425)
> +++ package/Makefile.autotools.in (arbetskopia)
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
>
> ################################################################################
>
> # Retrieve and unpack the archive
> -$(BUILD_DIR)/%/.stamp_downloaded:
> +$(DL_DIR)/$$($(PKG)_SOURCE):
> $(call MESSAGE,"Downloading")
> test -e $(DL_DIR)/$($(PKG)_SOURCE) || $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR)
> $($(PKG)_SITE)/$($(PKG)_SOURCE)
> mkdir -p $(@D)
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
> $(2)_TARGET_AUTORECONF = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_autoconfigured
> $(2)_TARGET_PATCH = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_patched
> $(2)_TARGET_EXTRACT = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_extracted
> -$(2)_TARGET_SOURCE = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_downloaded
> +$(2)_TARGET_SOURCE = $$(DL_DIR)/$$($(2)_SOURCE)
> $(2)_TARGET_UNINSTALL = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_uninstalled
> $(2)_TARGET_CLEAN = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_cleaned
> $(2)_TARGET_DIRCLEAN = $$($(2)_DIR)/.stamp_dircleaned
> @@ -322,6 +322,9 @@
>
> $(1)-depends: $(1)-source $$($(2)_DEPENDANCIES)
>
> +$$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE):
> + $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR) $$($(2)_SITE)/$$($(2)_SOURCE)
> +
> $(1)-source: $$($(2)_TARGET_SOURCE)
>
> # non-build targets
>
>
> Best Regards
> Ulf Samuelsson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 18:04 bogus [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-07 21:22 No subject bogus
2008-11-21 1:22 bogus
2008-10-23 17:17 bogus
2008-10-23 17:17 bogus
2008-10-23 17:17 bogus
2008-09-15 17:22 bogus
2008-09-15 17:22 bogus
2008-07-14 13:16 bogus
2008-07-14 13:16 bogus
2008-07-14 13:16 bogus
2008-07-14 13:16 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-04-23 14:39 bogus
2008-03-17 22:01 bogus
2007-12-01 7:52 bogus
2007-12-01 7:52 bogus
2007-10-06 20:13 bogus
2007-10-06 20:13 bogus
2007-10-06 20:13 bogus
2007-07-23 18:04 bogus
2007-06-23 20:07 bogus
2007-02-14 8:32 bogus
2007-02-14 8:32 bogus
2007-02-14 8:32 bogus
2007-02-14 8:32 bogus
2007-02-06 7:08 bogus
2007-02-06 7:08 bogus
2007-02-06 7:08 bogus
2007-02-06 7:08 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
2006-08-17 1:58 bogus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.1.1187102296.1107.buildroot@uclibc.org \
--to=bogus@does.not.exist.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox