From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/16] ceph: define ceph_auth_handshake type
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:04:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB50583.8000206@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB50329.7010206@inktank.com>
The definitions for the ceph_mds_session and ceph_osd both contain
five fields related only to "authorizers." Encapsulate those fields
into their own struct type, allowing for better isolation in some
upcoming patches.
Fix the #includes in "linux/ceph/osd_client.h" to lay out their more
complete canonical path.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
---
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 5 ++---
include/linux/ceph/auth.h | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h | 11 +++++------
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index 89971e1..42013c6 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@ -334,10 +334,10 @@ void ceph_put_mds_session(struct ceph_mds_session *s)
dout("mdsc put_session %p %d -> %d\n", s,
atomic_read(&s->s_ref), atomic_read(&s->s_ref)-1);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&s->s_ref)) {
- if (s->s_authorizer)
+ if (s->s_auth.authorizer)
s->s_mdsc->fsc->client->monc.auth->ops->destroy_authorizer(
s->s_mdsc->fsc->client->monc.auth,
- s->s_authorizer);
+ s->s_auth.authorizer);
kfree(s);
}
}
@@ -3404,29 +3404,29 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection
*con,
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = mdsc->fsc->client->monc.auth;
int ret = 0;
- if (force_new && s->s_authorizer) {
- ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, s->s_authorizer);
- s->s_authorizer = NULL;
+ if (force_new && s->s_auth.authorizer) {
+ ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, s->s_auth.authorizer);
+ s->s_auth.authorizer = NULL;
}
- if (s->s_authorizer == NULL) {
+ if (s->s_auth.authorizer == NULL) {
if (ac->ops->create_authorizer) {
ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(
ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MDS,
- &s->s_authorizer,
- &s->s_authorizer_buf,
- &s->s_authorizer_buf_len,
- &s->s_authorizer_reply_buf,
- &s->s_authorizer_reply_buf_len);
+ &s->s_auth.authorizer,
+ &s->s_auth.authorizer_buf,
+ &s->s_auth.authorizer_buf_len,
+ &s->s_auth.authorizer_reply_buf,
+ &s->s_auth.authorizer_reply_buf_len);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
}
*proto = ac->protocol;
- *buf = s->s_authorizer_buf;
- *len = s->s_authorizer_buf_len;
- *reply_buf = s->s_authorizer_reply_buf;
- *reply_len = s->s_authorizer_reply_buf_len;
+ *buf = s->s_auth.authorizer_buf;
+ *len = s->s_auth.authorizer_buf_len;
+ *reply_buf = s->s_auth.authorizer_reply_buf;
+ *reply_len = s->s_auth.authorizer_reply_buf_len;
return 0;
}
@@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ static int verify_authorizer_reply(struct
ceph_connection *con, int len)
struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = s->s_mdsc;
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = mdsc->fsc->client->monc.auth;
- return ac->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(ac, s->s_authorizer, len);
+ return ac->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(ac, s->s_auth.authorizer, len);
}
static int invalidate_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
index 8c7c04e..dd26846 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/ceph/types.h>
#include <linux/ceph/messenger.h>
#include <linux/ceph/mdsmap.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/auth.h>
/*
* Some lock dependencies:
@@ -113,9 +114,7 @@ struct ceph_mds_session {
struct ceph_connection s_con;
- struct ceph_authorizer *s_authorizer;
- void *s_authorizer_buf, *s_authorizer_reply_buf;
- size_t s_authorizer_buf_len, s_authorizer_reply_buf_len;
+ struct ceph_auth_handshake s_auth;
/* protected by s_gen_ttl_lock */
spinlock_t s_gen_ttl_lock;
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/auth.h b/include/linux/ceph/auth.h
index aa13392..5b774d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/ceph/auth.h
+++ b/include/linux/ceph/auth.h
@@ -14,6 +14,14 @@
struct ceph_auth_client;
struct ceph_authorizer;
+struct ceph_auth_handshake {
+ struct ceph_authorizer *authorizer;
+ void *authorizer_buf;
+ size_t authorizer_buf_len;
+ void *authorizer_reply_buf;
+ size_t authorizer_reply_buf_len;
+};
+
struct ceph_auth_client_ops {
const char *name;
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
index 7c05ac2..cedfb1a 100644
--- a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
+++ b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
@@ -6,9 +6,10 @@
#include <linux/mempool.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
-#include "types.h"
-#include "osdmap.h"
-#include "messenger.h"
+#include <linux/ceph/types.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/osdmap.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/messenger.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/auth.h>
/*
* Maximum object name size
@@ -40,9 +41,7 @@ struct ceph_osd {
struct list_head o_requests;
struct list_head o_linger_requests;
struct list_head o_osd_lru;
- struct ceph_authorizer *o_authorizer;
- void *o_authorizer_buf, *o_authorizer_reply_buf;
- size_t o_authorizer_buf_len, o_authorizer_reply_buf_len;
+ struct ceph_auth_handshake o_auth;
unsigned long lru_ttl;
int o_marked_for_keepalive;
struct list_head o_keepalive_item;
diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
index daa2716..66b09d6 100644
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -667,8 +667,8 @@ static void put_osd(struct ceph_osd *osd)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&osd->o_ref)) {
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = osd->o_osdc->client->monc.auth;
- if (osd->o_authorizer)
- ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, osd->o_authorizer);
+ if (osd->o_auth.authorizer)
+ ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, osd->o_auth.authorizer);
kfree(osd);
}
}
@@ -2117,27 +2117,27 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection
*con,
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = osdc->client->monc.auth;
int ret = 0;
- if (force_new && o->o_authorizer) {
- ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, o->o_authorizer);
- o->o_authorizer = NULL;
+ if (force_new && o->o_auth.authorizer) {
+ ac->ops->destroy_authorizer(ac, o->o_auth.authorizer);
+ o->o_auth.authorizer = NULL;
}
- if (o->o_authorizer == NULL) {
+ if (o->o_auth.authorizer == NULL) {
ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(
ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_OSD,
- &o->o_authorizer,
- &o->o_authorizer_buf,
- &o->o_authorizer_buf_len,
- &o->o_authorizer_reply_buf,
- &o->o_authorizer_reply_buf_len);
+ &o->o_auth.authorizer,
+ &o->o_auth.authorizer_buf,
+ &o->o_auth.authorizer_buf_len,
+ &o->o_auth.authorizer_reply_buf,
+ &o->o_auth.authorizer_reply_buf_len);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
*proto = ac->protocol;
- *buf = o->o_authorizer_buf;
- *len = o->o_authorizer_buf_len;
- *reply_buf = o->o_authorizer_reply_buf;
- *reply_len = o->o_authorizer_reply_buf_len;
+ *buf = o->o_auth.authorizer_buf;
+ *len = o->o_auth.authorizer_buf_len;
+ *reply_buf = o->o_auth.authorizer_reply_buf;
+ *reply_len = o->o_auth.authorizer_reply_buf_len;
return 0;
}
@@ -2148,7 +2148,7 @@ static int verify_authorizer_reply(struct
ceph_connection *con, int len)
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = o->o_osdc;
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = osdc->client->monc.auth;
- return ac->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(ac, o->o_authorizer, len);
+ return ac->ops->verify_authorizer_reply(ac, o->o_auth.authorizer, len);
}
static int invalidate_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con)
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 13:54 [PATCH 00/16] ceph: messenger cleanups and fixes Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/16] libceph: don't reset kvec in prepare_write_banner() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 02/16] ceph: messenger: reset connection kvec caller Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 03/16] ceph: messenger: send banner in process_connect() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 04/16] ceph: drop msgr argument from prepare_write_connect() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 05/16] ceph: don't set WRITE_PENDING too early Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 06/16] ceph: messenger: check prepare_write_connect() result Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 07/16] ceph: messenger: rework prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 08/16] ceph: messenger: check return from get_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 10/16] ceph: messenger: reduce args to create_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 11/16] ceph: ensure auth ops are defined before use Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 12/16] ceph: have get_authorizer methods return pointers Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 13/16] ceph: use info returned by get_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 14/16] ceph: return pointer from prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 15/16] ceph: rename prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 16/16] ceph: add auth buf in prepare_write_connect() Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB50583.8000206@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox