From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] ceph: have get_authorizer methods return pointers
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:05:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB50595.20909@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB50329.7010206@inktank.com>
Have the get_authorizer auth_client method return a ceph_auth
pointer rather than an integer, pointer-encoding any returned
error value. This is to pave the way for making use of the
returned value in an upcoming patch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
---
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
include/linux/ceph/messenger.h | 8 +++++---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 8 ++++----
net/ceph/osd_client.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index 4622817..67938a9 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@ -3395,15 +3395,20 @@ out:
/*
* authentication
*/
-static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con,
- void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
- void **reply_buf, int *reply_len, int force_new)
+
+/*
+ * Note: returned pointer is the address of a structure that's
+ * managed separately. Caller must *not* attempt to free it.
+ */
+static struct ceph_auth_handshake *get_authorizer(struct
ceph_connection *con,
+ void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
+ void **reply_buf, int *reply_len,
+ int force_new)
{
struct ceph_mds_session *s = con->private;
struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = s->s_mdsc;
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = mdsc->fsc->client->monc.auth;
struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth = &s->s_auth;
- int ret = 0;
if (force_new && auth->authorizer) {
if (ac->ops && ac->ops->destroy_authorizer)
@@ -3411,9 +3416,10 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection
*con,
auth->authorizer = NULL;
}
if (!auth->authorizer && ac->ops && ac->ops->create_authorizer) {
- ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MDS, auth);
+ int ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MDS,
+ auth);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
*proto = ac->protocol;
@@ -3422,7 +3428,7 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con,
*reply_buf = auth->authorizer_reply_buf;
*reply_len = auth->authorizer_reply_buf_len;
- return 0;
+ return auth;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h
index 3bff047..b10b55f 100644
--- a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h
+++ b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h
@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@ struct ceph_connection_operations {
void (*dispatch) (struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *m);
/* authorize an outgoing connection */
- int (*get_authorizer) (struct ceph_connection *con,
- void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
- void **reply_buf, int *reply_len, int force_new);
+ struct ceph_auth_handshake *(*get_authorizer) (
+ struct ceph_connection *con,
+ void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
+ void **reply_buf, int *reply_len,
+ int force_new);
int (*verify_authorizer_reply) (struct ceph_connection *con, int len);
int (*invalidate_authorizer)(struct ceph_connection *con);
diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
index e0532d5..ac27a2c 100644
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int prepare_connect_authorizer(struct
ceph_connection *con)
void *auth_buf;
int auth_len;
int auth_protocol;
- int ret;
+ struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
if (!con->ops->get_authorizer) {
con->out_connect.authorizer_protocol = CEPH_AUTH_UNKNOWN;
@@ -674,13 +674,13 @@ static int prepare_connect_authorizer(struct
ceph_connection *con)
auth_buf = NULL;
auth_len = 0;
auth_protocol = CEPH_AUTH_UNKNOWN;
- ret = con->ops->get_authorizer(con, &auth_buf, &auth_len,
+ auth = con->ops->get_authorizer(con, &auth_buf, &auth_len,
&auth_protocol, &con->auth_reply_buf,
&con->auth_reply_buf_len, con->auth_retry);
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (IS_ERR(auth))
+ return PTR_ERR(auth);
if (test_bit(CLOSED, &con->state) || test_bit(OPENING, &con->state))
return -EAGAIN;
diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
index f640bdf..fa74ae0 100644
--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -2108,15 +2108,19 @@ static void put_osd_con(struct ceph_connection *con)
/*
* authentication
*/
-static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con,
- void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
- void **reply_buf, int *reply_len, int force_new)
+/*
+ * Note: returned pointer is the address of a structure that's
+ * managed separately. Caller must *not* attempt to free it.
+ */
+static struct ceph_auth_handshake *get_authorizer(struct
ceph_connection *con,
+ void **buf, int *len, int *proto,
+ void **reply_buf, int *reply_len,
+ int force_new)
{
struct ceph_osd *o = con->private;
struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = o->o_osdc;
struct ceph_auth_client *ac = osdc->client->monc.auth;
struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth = &o->o_auth;
- int ret = 0;
if (force_new && auth->authorizer) {
if (ac->ops && ac->ops->destroy_authorizer)
@@ -2124,9 +2128,10 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection
*con,
auth->authorizer = NULL;
}
if (!auth->authorizer && ac->ops && ac->ops->create_authorizer) {
- ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_OSD, auth);
+ int ret = ac->ops->create_authorizer(ac, CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_OSD,
+ auth);
if (ret)
- return ret;
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
*proto = ac->protocol;
@@ -2135,7 +2140,7 @@ static int get_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con,
*reply_buf = auth->authorizer_reply_buf;
*reply_len = auth->authorizer_reply_buf_len;
- return 0;
+ return auth;
}
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 13:54 [PATCH 00/16] ceph: messenger cleanups and fixes Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:03 ` [PATCH 01/16] libceph: don't reset kvec in prepare_write_banner() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 02/16] ceph: messenger: reset connection kvec caller Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 03/16] ceph: messenger: send banner in process_connect() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 04/16] ceph: drop msgr argument from prepare_write_connect() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 05/16] ceph: don't set WRITE_PENDING too early Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 06/16] ceph: messenger: check prepare_write_connect() result Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 07/16] ceph: messenger: rework prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 08/16] ceph: messenger: check return from get_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 09/16] ceph: define ceph_auth_handshake type Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:04 ` [PATCH 10/16] ceph: messenger: reduce args to create_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 11/16] ceph: ensure auth ops are defined before use Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 13/16] ceph: use info returned by get_authorizer Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 14/16] ceph: return pointer from prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 15/16] ceph: rename prepare_connect_authorizer() Alex Elder
2012-05-17 14:05 ` [PATCH 16/16] ceph: add auth buf in prepare_write_connect() Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB50595.20909@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox