From: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
To: Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] rbd: encapsulate handling for a single request
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:01:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F866AD.4030802@inktank.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F5EA25.2070303@inktank.com>
On 01/15/2013 05:45 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 02:43 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> In rbd_rq_fn(), requests are fetched from the block layer and each
>> request is processed, looping through the request's list of bio's
>> until they've all been consumed.
>>
>> Separate the handling for a single request into its own function to
>> make it a bit easier to see what's going on.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
>> ---
. . .
>> -
>> - spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> -
>> + result = rbd_dev_do_request(rq, rbd_dev, snapc, ofs, size, bio);
>> ceph_put_snap_context(snapc);
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + if (result < 0)
>
> result may be 0 if num_segs == 0, which will make the request hang.
> I'm not sure if this will happen (or is even possible), but it's
> different from the previous behavior, which called
> __blk_end_request_all() in this case as well.
You're right. And I think there may be some valid special
zero-length requests (like cache flush requests or something).
The value of num_segs comes from rbd_get_num_segments(). The
only way that will ever return 0 is if the len it is provided
is 0.
So my fix will be to change the check after the spin_lock_irq()
call from this:
if (result < 0)
to this:
if (!size || result < 0)
I'll re-post the result shortly.
-Alex
>> + __blk_end_request_all(rq, result);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 22:42 [PATCH REPOST 0/2] rbd: simplify rbd_rq_fn() Alex Elder
2013-01-03 22:43 ` [PATCH REPOST 1/2] rbd: encapsulate handling for a single request Alex Elder
2013-01-15 23:45 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-17 21:01 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2013-01-17 21:04 ` [PATCH, v2] " Alex Elder
2013-01-17 21:30 ` Josh Durgin
2013-01-03 22:43 ` [PATCH REPOST 2/2] rbd: a little more cleanup of rbd_rq_fn() Alex Elder
2013-01-16 0:02 ` Josh Durgin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F866AD.4030802@inktank.com \
--to=elder@inktank.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josh.durgin@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox