CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Laurent Guerby <laurent@guerby.net>, Kevin Greenan <kmgreen2@gmail.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: GCC -msse2 portability question
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:50:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <532F3B0E.2050204@dachary.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]

Hi Laurent,

In the context of optimizing erasure code functions implemented by Kevin Greenan (cc'ed) and James Plank at https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/ we ran accross a question you may have the answer to: can gcc -msse2 (or -msse* for that matter ) have a negative impact on the portability of the compiled binary code ? 

In other words, if a code is compiled without -msse* and runs fine on all intel processors it targets, could it be that adding -msse* to the compilation of the same source code generate a binary that would fail on some processors ? This is assuming no sse specific functions were used in the source code.

In gf-complete, all sse specific instructions are carefully protected to not be run on a CPU that does not support them. The runtime detection is done by checking CPU id bits ( see https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/pull-request/7/probe-intel-sse-features-at-runtime/diff#Lsrc/gf_intel.cT28 )

The corresponding thread is at:

https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/pull-request/4/defer-the-decision-to-use-a-given-sse/diff#comment-1479296

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2014-03-23 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-23 19:50 Loic Dachary [this message]
2014-03-23 22:34 ` GCC -msse2 portability question Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-24 21:27   ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-25  9:43     ` Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-25  9:56       ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-25 11:22         ` Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-25 14:44           ` Milosz Tanski
2014-03-25 18:45             ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-24  1:40 ` Sage Weil
2014-03-25 19:08 ` Loic Dachary
     [not found]   ` <CA+AFVBhpOZEPehsd4qHCBr4aRzv60ZW8LzRwKsduUrZmLV1wxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-25 19:21     ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-25 19:46       ` Milosz Tanski
     [not found]         ` <CA+AFVBgOEz8_fv9H-8_kOuVSJNL3KQ+36b5kscfjnRMs09DZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <53327E59.7060408@dachary.org>
     [not found]             ` <CANP1eJG9xoCPkFs19KXG1RPUqc-D3aO_0SBOM=4WWFRN2JtX=g@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-26 18:24               ` Loic Dachary
     [not found]             ` <CANP1eJErc4qnRhtOCs=Cnh6VNtihLVcZxB1PSCQjpH0sFDBuWA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-26 22:13               ` Loic Dachary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=532F3B0E.2050204@dachary.org \
    --to=loic@dachary.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kmgreen2@gmail.com \
    --cc=laurent@guerby.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox