CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
Cc: Kevin Greenan <kmgreen2@gmail.com>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GCC -msse2 portability question
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:56:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <533152E9.50709@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395740605.15058.205.camel@pc2>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1876 bytes --]

Hi Laurent,

It occurs to me that all we're after is to enable SSE functions such as _mm_set_epi32. We're not trying to have the binary optimized in any implicit way, it is all explicit. The problem seems to be that -msse4.2 will do both 

* activate _mm_set_epi32 etc functions 
* optimize the binary to use sse4.2 instructions

Do you know of a compiler flag that would only 

* activate _mm_set_epi32 etc functions 

and not

* optimize the binary to use sse4.2 instructions

? It may be a RTFM question and I apologize for that. Reading http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options it looks like this is more or less what --mtune=corei7-avx would do (because gf-complete uses PCLMUL when available). But it feels weird to specify a specific processor model where what we need is a set of features. 

Thanks for your help :-)

On 25/03/2014 10:43, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 22:27 +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>> On 23/03/2014 23:34, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options
>>>
>>> So unless you want to run your code a very very old x86 32 bit processor
>>> "-msse" shouldn't be an issue. "-msse2" is similar.
>>
>> This is good to know :) Should I be worried about unintended side effects of -msse4.2 -mssse3 -msse4.1 or -mpclmul ? These are the flags that gf-complete are using, specifically.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> SSE4.2 will be available only in more recent
> processors as documented on the page above.
> 
> If your library already is dynamically checking for processor
> feature I would advise to be conservative in your
> -m flags, ie using what debian would use for maximum
> x86 portability.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Laurent
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-25  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-23 19:50 GCC -msse2 portability question Loic Dachary
2014-03-23 22:34 ` Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-24 21:27   ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-25  9:43     ` Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-25  9:56       ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2014-03-25 11:22         ` Laurent GUERBY
2014-03-25 14:44           ` Milosz Tanski
2014-03-25 18:45             ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-24  1:40 ` Sage Weil
2014-03-25 19:08 ` Loic Dachary
     [not found]   ` <CA+AFVBhpOZEPehsd4qHCBr4aRzv60ZW8LzRwKsduUrZmLV1wxQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-25 19:21     ` Loic Dachary
2014-03-25 19:46       ` Milosz Tanski
     [not found]         ` <CA+AFVBgOEz8_fv9H-8_kOuVSJNL3KQ+36b5kscfjnRMs09DZ6Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <53327E59.7060408@dachary.org>
     [not found]             ` <CANP1eJG9xoCPkFs19KXG1RPUqc-D3aO_0SBOM=4WWFRN2JtX=g@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-26 18:24               ` Loic Dachary
     [not found]             ` <CANP1eJErc4qnRhtOCs=Cnh6VNtihLVcZxB1PSCQjpH0sFDBuWA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-03-26 22:13               ` Loic Dachary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=533152E9.50709@dachary.org \
    --to=loic@dachary.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kmgreen2@gmail.com \
    --cc=laurent@guerby.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox