CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
To: Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujjuri@gmail.com>
Cc: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: newstore performance update
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:07:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554020DC.6020009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKTCLX31EBc8oOs6tVVRu4c5prUYD=3G=8fK3pMvLQTM+1iSQ@mail.gmail.com>

Nothing official, though roughly from memory:

~1.7GB/s and something crazy like 100K IOPS for the SSD.

~150MB/s and ~125-150 IOPS for the spinning disk.

Mark

On 04/28/2015 07:00 PM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote:
> Thanks for sharing; newstore numbers look lot better;
>
> Wondering if we have any base line numbers to put things into perspective.
> like what is it on XFS or on librados?
>
> JV
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Sage has been furiously working away at fixing bugs in newstore and
>> improving performance.  Specifically we've been focused on write performance
>> as newstore was lagging filestore but quite a bit previously.  A lot of work
>> has gone into implementing libaio behind the scenes and as a result
>> performance on spinning disks with SSD WAL (and SSD backed rocksdb) has
>> improved pretty dramatically. It's now often beating filestore:
>>
>> http://nhm.ceph.com/newstore/newstore-5d96fe6-no_overlay.pdf
>>
>> On the other hand, sequential writes are slower than random writes when the
>> OSD, DB, and WAL are all on the same device be it a spinning disk or SSD.
>> In this situation newstore does better with random writes and sometimes
>> beats filestore (such as in the everything-on-spinning disk tests, and when
>> IO sizes are small in the everything-on-ssd tests).
>>
>> Newstore is changing daily so keep in mind that these results are almost
>> assuredly going to change.  An interesting area of investigation will be why
>> sequential writes are slower than random writes, and whether or not we are
>> being limited by rocksdb ingest speed and how.
>>
>> I've also uploaded a quick perf call-graph I grabbed during the "all-SSD"
>> 32KB sequential write test to see if rocksdb was starving one of the cores,
>> but found something that looks quite a bit different:
>>
>> http://nhm.ceph.com/newstore/newstore-5d96fe6-no_overlay.pdf
>>
>> Mark
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28 23:25 newstore performance update Mark Nelson
2015-04-29  0:00 ` Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
2015-04-29  0:07   ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2015-04-29  2:59     ` kernel neophyte
2015-04-29  4:31       ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-04-29 13:11         ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-29 13:08       ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-29 15:55         ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-04-29 19:06           ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-30  1:08             ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-04-29  0:00 ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-29  8:33 ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-04-29 13:20   ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-29 15:00     ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-04-29 16:38   ` Sage Weil
2015-04-30 13:21     ` Haomai Wang
2015-04-30 16:20       ` Sage Weil
2015-04-30 13:28     ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-30 14:02       ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-04-30 14:11         ` Mark Nelson
2015-04-30 18:09           ` Sage Weil
2015-05-01 14:48             ` Mark Nelson
2015-05-01 15:22               ` Chen, Xiaoxi
2015-05-02  0:33               ` Sage Weil
2015-05-04 17:50                 ` Mark Nelson
2015-05-04 18:08                   ` Sage Weil
2015-05-05 17:43                     ` Mark Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554020DC.6020009@redhat.com \
    --to=mnelson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jujjuri@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox