From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] target: compare and write backend driver sense handling
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:41:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E9F3DC.1010404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438161835-27960-12-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com>
Hey Nick and Christoph,
For the target_core_iblock + rbd/COMPARE_AND_WRITE support approach, I
still need a patch like below to be able to allow target_core_iblock.c
to be able to specify specific codes like TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY.
Is the patch below ok? I made it work similar to how we have other
completion functions, target_complete_cmd_with_*, that take in extra
amounts of info like length or sense.
Instead, I can modify target_complete_cmd and all the callers so they
just take/pass the sense and info if needed:
void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status,
sense_reason_t sense, u32 info)
On 07/29/2015 04:23 AM, mchristi@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>
> Currently, backend drivers seem to only fail IO with
> SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION which gets us
> TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE.
> For compare and write support we will want to be able to fail with
> TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY. This patch adds a new helper that allows backend
> drivers to fail with specific sense codes.
>
> It also allows the backend driver to set the miscompare offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/target/target_core_backend.h | 1 +
> include/target/target_core_base.h | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> index ce8574b..f9b0527 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> @@ -639,8 +639,7 @@ static void target_complete_failure_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct se_cmd *cmd = container_of(work, struct se_cmd, work);
>
> - transport_generic_request_failure(cmd,
> - TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE);
> + transport_generic_request_failure(cmd, cmd->sense_reason);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -666,14 +665,15 @@ static unsigned char *transport_get_sense_buffer(struct se_cmd *cmd)
> return cmd->sense_buffer;
> }
>
> -void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
> +static void __target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status,
> + sense_reason_t sense_reason)
> {
> struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
> int success = scsi_status == GOOD;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> cmd->scsi_status = scsi_status;
> -
> + cmd->sense_reason = sense_reason;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->t_state_lock, flags);
> cmd->transport_state &= ~CMD_T_BUSY;
> @@ -716,8 +716,22 @@ void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
>
> queue_work(target_completion_wq, &cmd->work);
> }
> +
> +void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
> +{
> + __target_complete_cmd(cmd, scsi_status, scsi_status ?
> + TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE :
> + TCM_NO_SENSE);
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_complete_cmd);
>
> +void target_complete_cmd_with_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
> + sense_reason_t sense_reason)
> +{
> + __target_complete_cmd(cmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION, sense_reason);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_complete_cmd_with_sense);
> +
> void target_complete_cmd_with_length(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status, int length)
> {
> if (scsi_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD && length < cmd->data_length) {
> @@ -1650,6 +1664,7 @@ void transport_generic_request_failure(struct se_cmd *cmd,
> case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILED:
> case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_APP_TAG_CHECK_FAILED:
> case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_REF_TAG_CHECK_FAILED:
> + case TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY:
> break;
> case TCM_OUT_OF_RESOURCES:
> sense_reason = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> @@ -2633,12 +2648,19 @@ void transport_err_sector_info(unsigned char *buffer, sector_t bad_sector)
> buffer[SPC_ADD_SENSE_LEN_OFFSET] = 0xc;
> buffer[SPC_DESC_TYPE_OFFSET] = 0; /* Information */
> buffer[SPC_ADDITIONAL_DESC_LEN_OFFSET] = 0xa;
> - buffer[SPC_VALIDITY_OFFSET] = 0x80;
> + buffer[SPC_CMD_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET] = 0x80;
>
> /* Descriptor Information: failing sector */
> put_unaligned_be64(bad_sector, &buffer[12]);
> }
>
> +static void transport_err_sense_info(unsigned char *buffer, u32 info)
> +{
> + buffer[SPC_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET] |= 0x80;
> + /* Sense Information */
> + put_unaligned_be32(info, &buffer[3]);
> +}
> +
> int
> transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
> sense_reason_t reason, int from_transport)
> @@ -2831,6 +2853,7 @@ transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
> /* MISCOMPARE DURING VERIFY OPERATION */
> buffer[SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x1d;
> buffer[SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x00;
> + transport_err_sense_info(buffer, cmd->sense_info);
> break;
> case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILED:
> /* CURRENT ERROR */
> diff --git a/include/target/target_core_backend.h b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> index ec5a09f..c98f6e6 100644
> --- a/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> +++ b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int transport_backend_register(const struct target_backend_ops *);
> void target_backend_unregister(const struct target_backend_ops *);
>
> void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *, u8);
> +void target_complete_cmd_with_sense(struct se_cmd *, sense_reason_t);
> void target_complete_cmd_with_length(struct se_cmd *, u8, int);
>
> sense_reason_t spc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned int *size);
> diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> index 17ae2d6..b83a8ec 100644
> --- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
> +++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> @@ -22,11 +22,12 @@
> */
> #define TRANSPORT_SENSE_BUFFER 96
> /* Used by transport_send_check_condition_and_sense() */
> +#define SPC_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET 0
> #define SPC_SENSE_KEY_OFFSET 2
> #define SPC_ADD_SENSE_LEN_OFFSET 7
> #define SPC_DESC_TYPE_OFFSET 8
> #define SPC_ADDITIONAL_DESC_LEN_OFFSET 9
> -#define SPC_VALIDITY_OFFSET 10
> +#define SPC_CMD_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET 10
> #define SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET 12
> #define SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET 13
> #define TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN 224
> @@ -439,6 +440,8 @@ struct se_dif_v1_tuple {
> #define TCM_ACA_TAG 0x24
>
> struct se_cmd {
> + sense_reason_t sense_reason;
> + u32 sense_info;
> /* SAM response code being sent to initiator */
> u8 scsi_status;
> u8 scsi_asc;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-29 9:23 [PATCH 01/18] libceph: add scatterlist messenger data type mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 02/18] rbd: add support for scatterlist obj_request_type mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 03/18] rbd: add lio specific data area mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] libceph: support bidirectional requests mchristi
2015-11-21 23:32 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] libceph: add support for CMPEXT compare extent requests mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 06/18] rbd: add write test helper mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 07/18] rbd: add num ops calculator helper mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 08/18] rbd: add support for COMPARE_AND_WRITE/CMPEXT mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 09/18] libceph: add support for write same requests mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 10/18] rbd: add support for writesame requests mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 11/18] target: add compare and write callback mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 12/18] target: compare and write backend driver sense handling mchristi
2015-09-04 19:41 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2015-09-04 22:34 ` Andy Grover
2015-09-06 6:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-06 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 13/18] target: add COMPARE_AND_WRITE sg creation helper mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 14/18] libceph: fix pr_fmt compile issues mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 15/18] rbd: export some functions used by lio rbd backend mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 16/18] rbd: move structs used by lio rbd to new header mchristi
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 17/18] target: add rbd backend mchristi
2015-07-29 14:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2015-07-29 17:07 ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 18/18] target: add lio rbd to makefile/Kconfig mchristi
2015-07-29 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/18] libceph: add scatterlist messenger data type Alex Elder
2015-07-29 17:49 ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-29 22:59 ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29 23:40 ` Mike Christie
2015-07-30 7:34 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-07-30 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 10:33 ` David Disseldorp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E9F3DC.1010404@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox