CEPH filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] target: compare and write backend driver sense handling
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:41:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E9F3DC.1010404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438161835-27960-12-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com>

Hey Nick and Christoph,

For the target_core_iblock + rbd/COMPARE_AND_WRITE support approach, I
still need a patch like below to be able to allow target_core_iblock.c
to be able to specify specific codes like TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY.

Is the patch below ok? I made it work similar to how we have other
completion functions, target_complete_cmd_with_*, that take in extra
amounts of info like length or sense.

Instead, I can modify target_complete_cmd and all the callers so they
just take/pass the sense and info if needed:

void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status,
			 sense_reason_t sense, u32 info)

On 07/29/2015 04:23 AM, mchristi@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
> 
> Currently, backend drivers seem to only fail IO with
> SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION which gets us
> TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE.
> For compare and write support we will want to be able to fail with
> TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY. This patch adds a new helper that allows backend
> drivers to fail with specific sense codes.
> 
> It also allows the backend driver to set the miscompare offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/target/target_core_backend.h   |  1 +
>  include/target/target_core_base.h      |  5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> index ce8574b..f9b0527 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> @@ -639,8 +639,7 @@ static void target_complete_failure_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct se_cmd *cmd = container_of(work, struct se_cmd, work);
>  
> -	transport_generic_request_failure(cmd,
> -			TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE);
> +	transport_generic_request_failure(cmd, cmd->sense_reason);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -666,14 +665,15 @@ static unsigned char *transport_get_sense_buffer(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>  	return cmd->sense_buffer;
>  }
>  
> -void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
> +static void __target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status,
> +				  sense_reason_t sense_reason)
>  {
>  	struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
>  	int success = scsi_status == GOOD;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	cmd->scsi_status = scsi_status;
> -
> +	cmd->sense_reason = sense_reason;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->t_state_lock, flags);
>  	cmd->transport_state &= ~CMD_T_BUSY;
> @@ -716,8 +716,22 @@ void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
>  
>  	queue_work(target_completion_wq, &cmd->work);
>  }
> +
> +void target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status)
> +{
> +	__target_complete_cmd(cmd, scsi_status, scsi_status ?
> +			     TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE :
> +			     TCM_NO_SENSE);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_complete_cmd);
>  
> +void target_complete_cmd_with_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
> +				    sense_reason_t sense_reason)
> +{
> +	__target_complete_cmd(cmd, SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION, sense_reason);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(target_complete_cmd_with_sense);
> +
>  void target_complete_cmd_with_length(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 scsi_status, int length)
>  {
>  	if (scsi_status == SAM_STAT_GOOD && length < cmd->data_length) {
> @@ -1650,6 +1664,7 @@ void transport_generic_request_failure(struct se_cmd *cmd,
>  	case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILED:
>  	case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_APP_TAG_CHECK_FAILED:
>  	case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_REF_TAG_CHECK_FAILED:
> +	case TCM_MISCOMPARE_VERIFY:
>  		break;
>  	case TCM_OUT_OF_RESOURCES:
>  		sense_reason = TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE;
> @@ -2633,12 +2648,19 @@ void transport_err_sector_info(unsigned char *buffer, sector_t bad_sector)
>  	buffer[SPC_ADD_SENSE_LEN_OFFSET] = 0xc;
>  	buffer[SPC_DESC_TYPE_OFFSET] = 0; /* Information */
>  	buffer[SPC_ADDITIONAL_DESC_LEN_OFFSET] = 0xa;
> -	buffer[SPC_VALIDITY_OFFSET] = 0x80;
> +	buffer[SPC_CMD_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET] = 0x80;
>  
>  	/* Descriptor Information: failing sector */
>  	put_unaligned_be64(bad_sector, &buffer[12]);
>  }
>  
> +static void transport_err_sense_info(unsigned char *buffer, u32 info)
> +{
> +	buffer[SPC_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET] |= 0x80;
> +	/* Sense Information */
> +	put_unaligned_be32(info, &buffer[3]);
> +}
> +
>  int
>  transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
>  		sense_reason_t reason, int from_transport)
> @@ -2831,6 +2853,7 @@ transport_send_check_condition_and_sense(struct se_cmd *cmd,
>  		/* MISCOMPARE DURING VERIFY OPERATION */
>  		buffer[SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x1d;
>  		buffer[SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET] = 0x00;
> +		transport_err_sense_info(buffer, cmd->sense_info);
>  		break;
>  	case TCM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_GUARD_CHECK_FAILED:
>  		/* CURRENT ERROR */
> diff --git a/include/target/target_core_backend.h b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> index ec5a09f..c98f6e6 100644
> --- a/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> +++ b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int	transport_backend_register(const struct target_backend_ops *);
>  void	target_backend_unregister(const struct target_backend_ops *);
>  
>  void	target_complete_cmd(struct se_cmd *, u8);
> +void	target_complete_cmd_with_sense(struct se_cmd *, sense_reason_t);
>  void	target_complete_cmd_with_length(struct se_cmd *, u8, int);
>  
>  sense_reason_t	spc_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned int *size);
> diff --git a/include/target/target_core_base.h b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> index 17ae2d6..b83a8ec 100644
> --- a/include/target/target_core_base.h
> +++ b/include/target/target_core_base.h
> @@ -22,11 +22,12 @@
>   */
>  #define TRANSPORT_SENSE_BUFFER			96
>  /* Used by transport_send_check_condition_and_sense() */
> +#define SPC_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET		0
>  #define SPC_SENSE_KEY_OFFSET			2
>  #define SPC_ADD_SENSE_LEN_OFFSET		7
>  #define SPC_DESC_TYPE_OFFSET			8
>  #define SPC_ADDITIONAL_DESC_LEN_OFFSET		9
> -#define SPC_VALIDITY_OFFSET			10
> +#define SPC_CMD_INFO_VALIDITY_OFFSET		10
>  #define SPC_ASC_KEY_OFFSET			12
>  #define SPC_ASCQ_KEY_OFFSET			13
>  #define TRANSPORT_IQN_LEN			224
> @@ -439,6 +440,8 @@ struct se_dif_v1_tuple {
>  #define TCM_ACA_TAG	0x24
>  
>  struct se_cmd {
> +	sense_reason_t		sense_reason;
> +	u32			sense_info;
>  	/* SAM response code being sent to initiator */
>  	u8			scsi_status;
>  	u8			scsi_asc;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29  9:23 [PATCH 01/18] libceph: add scatterlist messenger data type mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 02/18] rbd: add support for scatterlist obj_request_type mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 03/18] rbd: add lio specific data area mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] libceph: support bidirectional requests mchristi
2015-11-21 23:32   ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] libceph: add support for CMPEXT compare extent requests mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 06/18] rbd: add write test helper mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 07/18] rbd: add num ops calculator helper mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 08/18] rbd: add support for COMPARE_AND_WRITE/CMPEXT mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 09/18] libceph: add support for write same requests mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 10/18] rbd: add support for writesame requests mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 11/18] target: add compare and write callback mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 12/18] target: compare and write backend driver sense handling mchristi
2015-09-04 19:41   ` Mike Christie [this message]
2015-09-04 22:34     ` Andy Grover
2015-09-06  6:38     ` Sagi Grimberg
2015-09-06  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 13/18] target: add COMPARE_AND_WRITE sg creation helper mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 14/18] libceph: fix pr_fmt compile issues mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 15/18] rbd: export some functions used by lio rbd backend mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 16/18] rbd: move structs used by lio rbd to new header mchristi
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 17/18] target: add rbd backend mchristi
2015-07-29 14:27   ` Bart Van Assche
2015-07-29 17:07     ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29  9:23 ` [PATCH 18/18] target: add lio rbd to makefile/Kconfig mchristi
2015-07-29 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/18] libceph: add scatterlist messenger data type Alex Elder
2015-07-29 17:49   ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-07-29 22:59   ` Mike Christie
2015-07-29 23:40     ` Mike Christie
2015-07-30  7:34       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2015-07-30 14:55       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 10:33 ` David Disseldorp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E9F3DC.1010404@redhat.com \
    --to=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox