osd dm-crypt key management, seconde partie

osd dm-crypt key management, seconde partie

[Loic Dachary]

Hi,

A first implementation[1] of the key management scheme[2] was completed today (it passes tests, integration and make check). While work is done to add tests to verify legacy key storage support, it would be great to get reviews and feedback. There is little time before the jewel merge window closes: now would be a perfect time to catch blockers :-)

Cheers

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7552/files 
[2] http://pad.ceph.com/p/osd-key-management

P.S. The previous mail thread on that topic was : "osd dm-crypt key management, part... deux?", hence the "seconde partie" instead, which carries the idea that there won't be a third part (yes, French has that kind of words : https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/second, 2.).

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: osd dm-crypt key management, seconde partie

[Sage Weil]

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A first implementation[1] of the key management scheme[2] was completed 
> today (it passes tests, integration and make check). While work is done 
> to add tests to verify legacy key storage support, it would be great to 
> get reviews and feedback. There is little time before the jewel merge 
> window closes: now would be a perfect time to catch blockers :-)

Great!  I skimmed the patchset (on my phone) and it looked clean and sane 
to me.  Joshua, maybe you can take a look at make sure this approach meets 
your needs as well?

Thanks!
sage

Re: osd dm-crypt key management, seconde partie

[Joshua Schmid]

On 02/24/2016 11:35 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A first implementation[1] of the key management scheme[2] was completed 
>> today (it passes tests, integration and make check). While work is done 
>> to add tests to verify legacy key storage support, it would be great to 
>> get reviews and feedback. There is little time before the jewel merge 
>> window closes: now would be a perfect time to catch blockers :-)
> 
> Great!  I skimmed the patchset (on my phone) and it looked clean and sane 
> to me.  Joshua, maybe you can take a look at make sure this approach meets 
> your needs as well?

Looks good to me! I'm pretty sure this will fit.
Thanks for the effort.

> 
> Thanks!
> sage
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Freundliche Grüße - Kind regards,
Joshua Schmid
SUSE Enterprise Storage
SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nürnberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard,
Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html