From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, xiubli@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ceph: clean up inode work queueing
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:34:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rfs2yg3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211123858.7522-3-jlayton@kernel.org> (Jeff Layton's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:38:57 -0500")
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> writes:
> Add a generic function for taking an inode reference, setting the I_WORK
> bit and queueing i_work. Turn the ceph_queue_* functions into static
> inline wrappers that pass in the right bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/ceph/inode.c | 55 ++++++-------------------------------------------
> fs/ceph/super.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> index c870be90d850..9cd8b37e586a 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> @@ -1816,60 +1816,17 @@ void ceph_async_iput(struct inode *inode)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Write back inode data in a worker thread. (This can't be done
> - * in the message handler context.)
> - */
> -void ceph_queue_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_WRITEBACK, &ci->i_work_mask);
> -
> - ihold(inode);
> - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> - &ci->i_work)) {
> - dout("ceph_queue_writeback %p\n", inode);
> - } else {
> - dout("ceph_queue_writeback %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> - inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> - iput(inode);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * queue an async invalidation
> - */
> -void ceph_queue_invalidate(struct inode *inode)
> -{
> - struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_INVALIDATE_PAGES, &ci->i_work_mask);
> -
> - ihold(inode);
> - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> - &ceph_inode(inode)->i_work)) {
> - dout("ceph_queue_invalidate %p\n", inode);
> - } else {
> - dout("ceph_queue_invalidate %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> - inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> - iput(inode);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Queue an async vmtruncate. If we fail to queue work, we will handle
> - * the truncation the next time we call __ceph_do_pending_vmtruncate.
> - */
> -void ceph_queue_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode)
> +void ceph_queue_inode_work(struct inode *inode, int work_bit)
> {
> + struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_inode_to_client(inode);
> struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_VMTRUNCATE, &ci->i_work_mask);
> + set_bit(work_bit, &ci->i_work_mask);
>
> ihold(inode);
> - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> - &ci->i_work)) {
> - dout("ceph_queue_vmtruncate %p\n", inode);
> + if (queue_work(fsc->inode_wq, &ceph_inode(inode)->i_work)) {
Nit: since we have ci, it should probably be used here^^ instead of
ceph_inode() (this is likely a ceph_queue_invalidate function leftover,
which already had this inconsistency).
Other than that, these patches look good although I (obviously) haven't
seen the lockdep warning you mention. Hopefully I'll never see it ever,
with these patches applied ;-)
Cheers,
--
Luis
> + dout("queue_inode_work %p, mask=%lx\n", inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> } else {
> - dout("ceph_queue_vmtruncate %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> + dout("queue_inode_work %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> iput(inode);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
> index b62d8fee3b86..59153ee201c0 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
> @@ -962,11 +962,26 @@ extern int ceph_inode_holds_cap(struct inode *inode, int mask);
>
> extern bool ceph_inode_set_size(struct inode *inode, loff_t size);
> extern void __ceph_do_pending_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode);
> -extern void ceph_queue_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode);
> -extern void ceph_queue_invalidate(struct inode *inode);
> -extern void ceph_queue_writeback(struct inode *inode);
> +
> extern void ceph_async_iput(struct inode *inode);
>
> +void ceph_queue_inode_work(struct inode *inode, int work_bit);
> +
> +static inline void ceph_queue_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + ceph_queue_inode_work(inode, CEPH_I_WORK_VMTRUNCATE);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ceph_queue_invalidate(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + ceph_queue_inode_work(inode, CEPH_I_WORK_INVALIDATE_PAGES);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void ceph_queue_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + ceph_queue_inode_work(inode, CEPH_I_WORK_WRITEBACK);
> +}
> +
> extern int __ceph_do_getattr(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page,
> int mask, bool force);
> static inline int ceph_do_getattr(struct inode *inode, int mask, bool force)
> --
>
> 2.29.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 12:38 [PATCH 0/3] ceph: don't call ceph_check_caps in page_mkwrite Jeff Layton
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] ceph: fix flush_snap logic after putting caps Jeff Layton
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] ceph: clean up inode work queueing Jeff Layton
2020-12-14 15:34 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2020-12-14 15:51 ` Jeff Layton
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] ceph: allow queueing cap/snap handling after putting cap references Jeff Layton
2020-12-18 14:22 ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-18 21:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rfs2yg3.fsf@suse.de \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox