From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, xiubli@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ceph: clean up inode work queueing
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:51:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c66a8ed80a647620a4f9ca837c44bf278d15ca9c.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rfs2yg3.fsf@suse.de>
On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 15:34 +0000, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > Add a generic function for taking an inode reference, setting the I_WORK
> > bit and queueing i_work. Turn the ceph_queue_* functions into static
> > inline wrappers that pass in the right bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/ceph/inode.c | 55 ++++++-------------------------------------------
> > fs/ceph/super.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > index c870be90d850..9cd8b37e586a 100644
> > --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> > @@ -1816,60 +1816,17 @@ void ceph_async_iput(struct inode *inode)
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Write back inode data in a worker thread. (This can't be done
> > - * in the message handler context.)
> > - */
> > -void ceph_queue_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> > -{
> > - struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> > - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_WRITEBACK, &ci->i_work_mask);
> > -
> > - ihold(inode);
> > - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> > - &ci->i_work)) {
> > - dout("ceph_queue_writeback %p\n", inode);
> > - } else {
> > - dout("ceph_queue_writeback %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> > - inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> > - iput(inode);
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * queue an async invalidation
> > - */
> > -void ceph_queue_invalidate(struct inode *inode)
> > -{
> > - struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> > - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_INVALIDATE_PAGES, &ci->i_work_mask);
> > -
> > - ihold(inode);
> > - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> > - &ceph_inode(inode)->i_work)) {
> > - dout("ceph_queue_invalidate %p\n", inode);
> > - } else {
> > - dout("ceph_queue_invalidate %p already queued, mask=%lx\n",
> > - inode, ci->i_work_mask);
> > - iput(inode);
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Queue an async vmtruncate. If we fail to queue work, we will handle
> > - * the truncation the next time we call __ceph_do_pending_vmtruncate.
> > - */
> > -void ceph_queue_vmtruncate(struct inode *inode)
> > +void ceph_queue_inode_work(struct inode *inode, int work_bit)
> > {
> > + struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_inode_to_client(inode);
> > struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> > - set_bit(CEPH_I_WORK_VMTRUNCATE, &ci->i_work_mask);
> > + set_bit(work_bit, &ci->i_work_mask);
> >
> >
> > ihold(inode);
> > - if (queue_work(ceph_inode_to_client(inode)->inode_wq,
> > - &ci->i_work)) {
> > - dout("ceph_queue_vmtruncate %p\n", inode);
> > + if (queue_work(fsc->inode_wq, &ceph_inode(inode)->i_work)) {
>
> Nit: since we have ci, it should probably be used here^^ instead of
> ceph_inode() (this is likely a ceph_queue_invalidate function leftover,
> which already had this inconsistency).
>
> Other than that, these patches look good although I (obviously) haven't
> seen the lockdep warning you mention. Hopefully I'll never see it ever,
> with these patches applied ;-)
>
> Cheers,
Thanks Luis,
I went ahead and made the above change and pushed the set into the
testing branch (note that this patch supersedes the queue_inode_work
patch I sent a couple of weeks ago).
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 12:38 [PATCH 0/3] ceph: don't call ceph_check_caps in page_mkwrite Jeff Layton
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] ceph: fix flush_snap logic after putting caps Jeff Layton
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] ceph: clean up inode work queueing Jeff Layton
2020-12-14 15:34 ` Luis Henriques
2020-12-14 15:51 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2020-12-11 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] ceph: allow queueing cap/snap handling after putting cap references Jeff Layton
2020-12-18 14:22 ` Ilya Dryomov
2020-12-18 21:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c66a8ed80a647620a4f9ca837c44bf278d15ca9c.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox