From: Abhishek L <abhishek@suse.com>
To: Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>,
"Dachary, Loic" <ldachary@redhat.com>,
"Dachary, Loic" <loic@dachary.org>,
"Dillaman, Jason" <dillaman@redhat.com>,
Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, John Spray <jspray@redhat.com>,
"Durgin, Josh" <jdurgin@redhat.com>,
Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:39:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r362tr92.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMMFjmGRO7F30WwU8NwMU=t3bEXEhz1G6bwZwqyQJrp7mceZdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sage, Greg,
Yuri Weinstein writes:
> See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>
> Outstanding issues:
>
> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
> pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
>
> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
> pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
> to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
>
> Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
> findings/summary.
Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
Best,
Abhishek
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>>
>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>
>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>> rbd
>> rgw
>> fs
>> krbd
>> kcephfs
>> knfs
>> rest
>> hadoop
>> samba
>> ceph-deploy
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated
>> powercycle
>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>
>> ==============================
>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>
>> fs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17832 (Greg pls review/approve)
>>
>> krbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221 (Jason, Ilya pls review/approve)
>>
>> knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
>> pls review/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
>> pls review/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated, but Nathan is still working
>> to make it pass (Sage pls review/approve)
>>
>> powercycle - in progress
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-23 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 16:47 ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
2016-11-11 16:58 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-11-13 12:15 ` John Spray
2016-11-13 12:34 ` Nathan Cutler
2016-11-14 22:20 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-11-15 8:18 ` Nathan Cutler
2016-11-23 10:39 ` Abhishek L [this message]
2016-11-23 14:39 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-11-23 14:42 ` Sage Weil
2016-11-23 15:06 ` John Spray
2016-11-29 10:46 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 14:57 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:01 ` Sage Weil
2016-11-30 16:21 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:29 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:57 ` Sage Weil
2016-12-02 14:00 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-05 11:53 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-07 13:06 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-11-30 16:09 ` Josh Durgin
2016-11-30 16:23 ` Abhishek L
2016-11-30 16:35 ` Josh Durgin
2016-11-30 21:56 ` Ken Dreyer
2016-11-30 22:09 ` Abhishek L
2016-12-01 8:09 ` Yoann Moulin
2016-12-01 13:26 ` Alfredo Deza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r362tr92.fsf@suse.com \
--to=abhishek@suse.com \
--cc=abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=jspray@redhat.com \
--cc=ldachary@redhat.com \
--cc=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=ncutler@suse.cz \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox