Re: ceph v10.2.4 QE validation status

[Abhishek L <abhishek@suse.com>]

Abhishek L writes:

> Sage Weil writes:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote:
>>>
>>> Abhishek L writes:
>>>
>>> > Sage Weil writes:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Abhishek L wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi Sage, Greg,
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Yuri Weinstein writes:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > See updated status - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-32
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Outstanding issues:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > knfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16397 (same as in v10.2.3, Greg
>>> >>> > pls review/approve, assumed Approved ?)
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 ((Sage
>>> >>> > pls review/approve, seems persistent, but maybe not a showstopper)
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel) - deprecated (Nathan is still working
>>> >>> > to make it pass, see issues in the tacker summary above)
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Sage, jewel 10.2.4 can be released as soon as you agree with the
>>> >>> > findings/summary.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do you think we're ready to release 10.2.4 yet?
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm reproducing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17847 with logs to make
>>> >> sure this isn't a regression.
>>> >>
>>> >> We can ignore the infernalis runs.
>>> >>
>>> >> I think we can ignore the knfs selinux issue too.. Greg, can you confirm?
>>> >>
>>> > Added the prs 12001 & 12167 on top of the jewel branch and scheduled rados runs
>>> > at
>>> > http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-29_10:22:25-rados-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/ &
>>
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1292
>>
>> avoids xenial for the rados upgrade tests (in jewel branch).

Ah alright, maybe this was the cause after all, let's get this in (or
push a branch to ceph-qa-suite so that I can schedule against that)
>>
>> The upgrade tests already explicitly call out trusty, so they should be
>> fine.
>>
>>> > updated the tracker at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-17,
>>> > with details of the test. I'll update the progress once the suite goes
>>> > through
>>>
>>> Had around 11 tests fail from 296 scheduled, there were a couple of
>>> valgrind issues on ceph-mon (which were seen at earlier runs on jewel as
>>> well) and an s3test failure, rest of the issues were looking related to
>>> infrastructure as they were failing to get specific version numbers from
>>> gitbuilders.
>>>
>>> Reported this issue as:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089
>>>
>>> subsequent re runs are still failing with similar errors. The details
>>> are updated at
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-37
>>>
>>> The upgrade suite has also failed with similar errors.
>>
>> Which one?
> The upgrade/client-upgrade suite (I hope this is the right upgrade
> suite), the errors are the same failed to fetch package version errors
> seen for the rados suite, so not actual test run errors yet.
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2016-11-30_09:58:50-upgrade:client-upgrade-wip-jewel-10-2-4-distro-basic-smithi/
> is the run
>
> Best,
> Abhishek


--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)