[PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: add lockdep asserts

[PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: add lockdep asserts

[Tejun Heo]

device_cgroup uses RCU safe ->exceptions list which is write-protected
by devcgroup_mutex and has had some issues using locking correctly.
Add lockdep asserts to utility functions so that future errors can be
easily detected.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
If this looks good, I'll route it with Aristeu's earlier patch through
cgroup/for-3.7-fixes.  Thanks.

 security/device_cgroup.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static int dev_exceptions_copy(struct li
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp, *new;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(ex, orig, list) {
 		new = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!new)
@@ -107,6 +109,8 @@ static int dev_exception_add(struct dev_
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *excopy, *walk;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	excopy = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!excopy)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -137,6 +141,8 @@ static void dev_exception_rm(struct dev_
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *walk, *tmp;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(walk, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		if (walk->type != ex->type)
 			continue;
@@ -163,6 +169,8 @@ static void dev_exception_clean(struct d
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ex, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		list_del_rcu(&ex->list);
 		kfree_rcu(ex, rcu);
@@ -298,6 +306,10 @@ static int may_access(struct dev_cgroup
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
 	bool match = false;
 
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
+			   lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
+			   "device_cgroup::may_access() called without proper synchronization");
+
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		if ((refex->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEV_BLOCK))
 			continue;

[PATCH 2/2] device_cgroup: add lockdep asserts

[Tejun Heo]

device_cgroup uses RCU safe ->exceptions list which is write-protected
by devcgroup_mutex and has had some issues using locking correctly.
Add lockdep asserts to utility functions so that future errors can be
easily detected.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
And this one through cgroup/for-3.8.

Thanks.

 security/device_cgroup.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static int dev_exceptions_copy(struct li
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp, *new;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(ex, orig, list) {
 		new = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!new)
@@ -107,6 +109,8 @@ static int dev_exception_add(struct dev_
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *excopy, *walk;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	excopy = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!excopy)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -137,6 +141,8 @@ static void dev_exception_rm(struct dev_
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *walk, *tmp;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(walk, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		if (walk->type != ex->type)
 			continue;
@@ -163,6 +169,8 @@ static void dev_exception_clean(struct d
 {
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ex, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		list_del_rcu(&ex->list);
 		kfree_rcu(ex, rcu);
@@ -298,6 +306,10 @@ static int may_access(struct dev_cgroup
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
 	bool match = false;
 
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
+			   lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
+			   "device_cgroup::may_access() called without proper synchronization");
+
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		if ((refex->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEV_BLOCK))
 			continue;

[PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: fix RCU usage

[Tejun Heo]

dev_cgroup->exceptions is protected with devcgroup_mutex for writes
and RCU for reads; however, RCU usage isn't correct.

* dev_exception_clean() doesn't use RCU variant of list_del() and
  kfree().  The function can race with may_access() and may_access()
  may end up dereferencing already freed memory.  Use list_del_rcu()
  and kfree_rcu() instead.

* may_access() may be called only with RCU read locked but doesn't use
  RCU safe traversal over ->exceptions.  Use list_for_each_entry_rcu().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
Oops, wrong patch.  This is the correct one.

Thanks.

 security/device_cgroup.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static void dev_exception_clean(struct d
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ex, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
-		list_del(&ex->list);
-		kfree(ex);
+		list_del_rcu(&ex->list);
+		kfree_rcu(ex, rcu);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int may_access(struct dev_cgroup
 	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
 	bool match = false;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
 		if ((refex->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEV_BLOCK))
 			continue;
 		if ((refex->type & DEV_CHAR) && !(ex->type & DEV_CHAR))

Re: [PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: fix RCU usage

[Serge Hallyn]

Quoting Tejun Heo (tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org):
> dev_cgroup->exceptions is protected with devcgroup_mutex for writes
> and RCU for reads; however, RCU usage isn't correct.
> 
> * dev_exception_clean() doesn't use RCU variant of list_del() and
>   kfree().  The function can race with may_access() and may_access()
>   may end up dereferencing already freed memory.  Use list_del_rcu()
>   and kfree_rcu() instead.
> 
> * may_access() may be called only with RCU read locked but doesn't use
>   RCU safe traversal over ->exceptions.  Use list_for_each_entry_rcu().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

thanks,
-serge

> ---
> Oops, wrong patch.  This is the correct one.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  security/device_cgroup.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/security/device_cgroup.c
> +++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
> @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static void dev_exception_clean(struct d
>  	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(ex, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
> -		list_del(&ex->list);
> -		kfree(ex);
> +		list_del_rcu(&ex->list);
> +		kfree_rcu(ex, rcu);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int may_access(struct dev_cgroup
>  	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
>  	bool match = false;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
>  		if ((refex->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEV_BLOCK))
>  			continue;
>  		if ((refex->type & DEV_CHAR) && !(ex->type & DEV_CHAR))

Re: [PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: fix RCU usage

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:48:41AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Tejun Heo (tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org):
> > dev_cgroup->exceptions is protected with devcgroup_mutex for writes
> > and RCU for reads; however, RCU usage isn't correct.
> > 
> > * dev_exception_clean() doesn't use RCU variant of list_del() and
> >   kfree().  The function can race with may_access() and may_access()
> >   may end up dereferencing already freed memory.  Use list_del_rcu()
> >   and kfree_rcu() instead.
> > 
> > * may_access() may be called only with RCU read locked but doesn't use
> >   RCU safe traversal over ->exceptions.  Use list_for_each_entry_rcu().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Thanks, applied to cgroup/for-3.7-fixes.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: add lockdep asserts

[Serge Hallyn]

Quoting Tejun Heo (tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org):
> device_cgroup uses RCU safe ->exceptions list which is write-protected
> by devcgroup_mutex and has had some issues using locking correctly.
> Add lockdep asserts to utility functions so that future errors can be
> easily detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

> ---
> If this looks good, I'll route it with Aristeu's earlier patch through
> cgroup/for-3.7-fixes.  Thanks.
> 
>  security/device_cgroup.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> --- a/security/device_cgroup.c
> +++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ static int dev_exceptions_copy(struct li
>  {
>  	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp, *new;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(ex, orig, list) {
>  		new = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!new)
> @@ -107,6 +109,8 @@ static int dev_exception_add(struct dev_
>  {
>  	struct dev_exception_item *excopy, *walk;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
> +
>  	excopy = kmemdup(ex, sizeof(*ex), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!excopy)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -137,6 +141,8 @@ static void dev_exception_rm(struct dev_
>  {
>  	struct dev_exception_item *walk, *tmp;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(walk, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
>  		if (walk->type != ex->type)
>  			continue;
> @@ -163,6 +169,8 @@ static void dev_exception_clean(struct d
>  {
>  	struct dev_exception_item *ex, *tmp;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&devcgroup_mutex);
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(ex, tmp, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
>  		list_del_rcu(&ex->list);
>  		kfree_rcu(ex, rcu);
> @@ -298,6 +306,10 @@ static int may_access(struct dev_cgroup
>  	struct dev_exception_item *ex;
>  	bool match = false;
>  
> +	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
> +			   lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
> +			   "device_cgroup::may_access() called without proper synchronization");
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &dev_cgroup->exceptions, list) {
>  		if ((refex->type & DEV_BLOCK) && !(ex->type & DEV_BLOCK))
>  			continue;

Re: [PATCH 1/2] device_cgroup: add lockdep asserts

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:40:36AM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Tejun Heo (tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org):
> > device_cgroup uses RCU safe ->exceptions list which is write-protected
> > by devcgroup_mutex and has had some issues using locking correctly.
> > Add lockdep asserts to utility functions so that future errors can be
> > easily detected.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Applied to cgroup/for-3.8.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun