[PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c

[PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c

[Tejun Heo]

fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is making use of xattr but was getting linux/xattr.h
indirectly through linux/cgroup.h, which will soon drop the inclusion
of xattr.h.  Explicitly include linux/xattr.h from nfs3proc.c so that
compilation doesn't fail when linux/cgroup.h drops linux/xattr.h.

As the following cgroup changes will depend on these changes, it
probably would be easier to route this through cgroup branch.  Would
that be okay?

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
---
 fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/lockd/bind.h>
 #include <linux/nfs_mount.h>
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/xattr.h>
 
 #include "iostat.h"
 #include "internal.h"

Re: [PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c

[Trond Myklebust]

On Feb 3, 2014, at 14:31, Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is making use of xattr but was getting linux/xattr.h
> indirectly through linux/cgroup.h, which will soon drop the inclusion
> of xattr.h.  Explicitly include linux/xattr.h from nfs3proc.c so that
> compilation doesn't fail when linux/cgroup.h drops linux/xattr.h.
> 
> As the following cgroup changes will depend on these changes, it
> probably would be easier to route this through cgroup branch.  Would
> that be okay?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>

EWRONGMAINTAINER… :-)

Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>

> Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c |    1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/lockd/bind.h>
> #include <linux/nfs_mount.h>
> #include <linux/freezer.h>
> +#include <linux/xattr.h>
> 
> #include "iostat.h"
> #include "internal.h"
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

Re: [PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:48:13PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 14:31, Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is making use of xattr but was getting linux/xattr.h
> > indirectly through linux/cgroup.h, which will soon drop the inclusion
> > of xattr.h.  Explicitly include linux/xattr.h from nfs3proc.c so that
> > compilation doesn't fail when linux/cgroup.h drops linux/xattr.h.
> > 
> > As the following cgroup changes will depend on these changes, it
> > probably would be easier to route this through cgroup branch.  Would
> > that be okay?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> 
> EWRONGMAINTAINER… :-)
> 
> Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>

Oopsy, thanks! :)

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c

[Tejun Heo]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:31:07PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is making use of xattr but was getting linux/xattr.h
> indirectly through linux/cgroup.h, which will soon drop the inclusion
> of xattr.h.  Explicitly include linux/xattr.h from nfs3proc.c so that
> compilation doesn't fail when linux/cgroup.h drops linux/xattr.h.
> 
> As the following cgroup changes will depend on these changes, it
> probably would be easier to route this through cgroup branch.  Would
> that be okay?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org

Applied to cgroup/for-3.14-fixes w/ Trond's ack added.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html