Linux cgroups development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay <devnull+ackerleytng.google.com@kernel.org>
To: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,  Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>,
	fvdl@google.com, rientjes@google.com,  jthoughton@google.com,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	 Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>,  Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@linux.dev>,
	Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>,
	 Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@huawei.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: vannapurve@google.com, erdemaktas@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/16] mm: hugetlb: Return -ENOSPC on memcg charge failure
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:41:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722-hugetlb-alloc-failure-fixes-v4-2-88e8b81970dc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722-hugetlb-alloc-failure-fixes-v4-0-88e8b81970dc@google.com>

From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>

When mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb() fails with -ENOMEM, alloc_hugetlb_folio()
currently propagates this error. This results in the page fault handler
returning VM_FAULT_OOM.

Because HugeTLB allocations are high-order and use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
they bypass the OOM killer. Returning VM_FAULT_OOM to the #PF handler
without triggering the OOM killer (or having it make progress) leads to
an infinite loop of retrying the fault.

Avoid this loop by returning -ENOSPC when charging fails, which maps to
VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, terminating the process cleanly.

Make mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb() fault handling use a common error handling
path, the same handling used for hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup{,_rsvd}(),
which also don't trigger the OOM killer and hence opt to terminate the
process with a SIGBUS.

Fixes: 991135774c0e0 ("memcg/hugetlb: introduce mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 36fa3fb3945d8..15f9c5a9f75e2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3010,7 +3010,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
 		free_huge_folio(folio);
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	return folio;
@@ -3035,6 +3035,16 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 out_end_reservation:
 	if (map_chg != MAP_CHG_ENFORCED)
 		vma_end_reservation(h, vma, addr);
+err:
+	/*
+	 * Return -ENOSPC when this function fails to allocate or charge a huge
+	 * page. If a standard (PAGE_SIZE) page allocation fails, the OOM killer
+	 * is given a chance to run, which may resolve the failure on
+	 * retry. However, for HugeTLB allocations, the OOM killer is not
+	 * triggered.  Returning -ENOMEM (or anything resulting in VM_FAULT_OOM)
+	 * would leak to the #PF handler, causing it to loop indefinitely
+	 * retrying the fault.
+	 */
 	return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
 }
 

-- 
2.55.0.229.g6434b31f56-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22 23:41 [PATCH v4 00/16] Fix bugs on HugeTLB folio allocation failure paths Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] mm: hugetlb: Track used_hpages when getting/putting pages from subpool Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-29 17:14   ` Ackerley Tng
2026-07-22 23:41 ` Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] mm: hugetlb: Use try-commit-cancel protocol for memcg charge of folios Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] mm: hugetlb: Remove unused mem_cgroup_charge_hugetlb function Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] mm: hugetlb: Fix subpool usage leak on allocation failure Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] mm: hugetlb: Rename local variables for clarity in hugetlb_reserve_pages() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] mm: hugetlb: Fix Use-After-Free in unlock_or_release_subpool() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] fs: hugetlbfs: Fix global reservation leak in hugetlbfs_fill_super() Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] WIP: mm: hugetlb: Move subpool functions to hugetlb_subpool.c Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] WIP: fs: hugetlbfs: Refactor subpool getters and integrate with hugetlb_subpool API Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] WIP: mm: hugetlb: Make struct hugepage_subpool private to hugetlb_subpool.c Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] WIP: tools: testing: Add unit tests for HugeTLB subpool functions Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] WIP: Reproducer for allocation failure due to cgroup v2 memory limits Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] WIP: Reproducer for subpool usage leak Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] WIP: Reproducer for false restoration on shared HugeTLB mappings Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 23:41 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] WIP: Reproducer for out_put_pages subpool reserve leakage Ackerley Tng via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722-hugetlb-alloc-failure-fixes-v4-2-88e8b81970dc@google.com \
    --to=devnull+ackerleytng.google.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
    --cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=louhongxiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=si.yanteng@linux.dev \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox