From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Use %p for pointer formatting
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:56:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918165651.-T6A2FGq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aq0z3hEYggA_TuUD@localhost.localdomain>
On 2026-09-18 14:59:00 [+0200], Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > Since commit ad67b74d2469d ("printk: hash addresses printed with
> > %p") pointers are hashed by default and the behaviour can be controller
> > by `hash_pointers' boot argument.
> > The policy on %p is to not introduce new ones.
> %pK should be here?
No, %p was intended. By making it %p it is "introducing" it. The "not
introducing new ones" is based on
https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#p-format-specifier
> I assume it based on:
>
> | This is because %pK checks are done at read() time rather than open()
> | ...
> | The correct long-term solution is to do the permission checks at
> | open() time.
>
> of Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst-time
These checks never came. I need to update that file as well…
> <snip>
> > Removing %pK makes it possible to remove its handling from the library.
>
> This is also a good sell.
> But I see there are a few of them still here and there.
I am working on it ;) I just sent all code patches and networking
has it applied in -next. So it is moving.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > kernel/cgroup/debug.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Nevertheless,
> Acked-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thank you.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 10:48 [PATCH] cgroup: Use %p for pointer formatting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-09-18 12:59 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-18 16:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-09-19 0:12 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918165651.-T6A2FGq@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox